The Single Dominant Medial Row Perforator DIEP Flap in Breast Reconstruction: Three-Dimensional Perforasome and Clinical Results

被引:97
作者
Bailey, Steven H. [1 ]
Saint-Cyr, Michel [1 ]
Wong, Corrine [1 ]
Mojallal, Ali [1 ]
Zhang, Kathy [1 ]
Ouyang, Da [1 ]
Arbique, Gary [1 ]
Trussler, Andrew [1 ]
Rohrich, Rod J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Plast Surg, Dallas, TX 75290 USA
关键词
INFERIOR EPIGASTRIC PERFORATOR; FREE TRAM; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181e5f844
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
100210 [外科学];
摘要
Background: Successful outcomes with the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap are heavily dependent on identifying the largest perforators. The purpose of this study was to describe the vascular anatomy (location, size, zones of perfusion, and variations) of the single most dominant deep inferior epigastric artery perforator and to report a clinical series based on this flap. Methods: Eleven abdominal flaps were harvested from fresh adult cadavers, and measurements were combined with clinical measurements from 16 patients. Details such as perforator size, location, type, and zones of perfusion were documented for all flaps and clinical outcomes for all patients. Results: A total of 36 flaps were dissected with an average perforator location within a 3-cm radius of the umbilicus and an average perforator size greater than 1.8 mm. Computed tomographic scans of the cadaver abdominal flaps demonstrated consistent perfusion in zones I and II and half of zones III and IV. Clinical results showed partial flap necrosis in one patient and fat necrosis of less than 5 percent in three patients, all of which occurred in the distal portion of zone III. The deep inferior epigastric artery medial row perforators near the umbilicus were found to be the largest perforators in the entire deep inferior epigastric artery system and abdomen. Conclusions: The single dominant medial row perforator has a maximal vascularity in zones I and II, and less in zones III an IV. The authors recommend that half of zone III and all of zone IV be discarded to avoid the risks of partial flap loss and fat necrosis. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 126: 739, 2010.)
引用
收藏
页码:739 / 751
页数:13
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]
DEEP INFERIOR EPIGASTRIC PERFORATOR FLAP FOR BREAST RECONSTRUCTION [J].
ALLEN, RJ ;
TREECE, P .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1994, 32 (01) :32-38
[2]
The donor site morbidity of free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction [J].
Blondeel, PN ;
Vanderstraeten, GG ;
Monstrey, SJ ;
VanLanduyt, K ;
Tonnard, P ;
Lysens, R ;
Boeckx, WD ;
Matton, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1997, 50 (05) :322-330
[3]
One hundred free DIEP flap breast reconstructions: a personal experience [J].
Blondeel, PN .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1999, 52 (02) :104-111
[4]
A retrospective comparison of abdominal muscle strength following breast reconstruction with a free TRAM or DIEP flap [J].
Futter, CM ;
Webster, MHC ;
Hagen, S ;
Mitchell, SL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2000, 53 (07) :578-583
[5]
Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in breast reconstruction: Experience with the first 50 flaps [J].
Hamdi, M ;
Weiler-Mithoff, EM ;
Webster, MHC .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1999, 103 (01) :86-95
[6]
Paraumbilical perforator flap without deep inferior epigastric vessels [J].
Koshima, I ;
Inagawa, K ;
Urushibara, K ;
Moriguchi, T .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 102 (04) :1052-1057
[7]
KOSHIMA I, 1991, J RECONSTR MICROSURG, V7, P313
[8]
FREE THIN PARAUMBILICAL PERFORATOR-BASED FLAPS [J].
KOSHIMA, I ;
MORIGUCHI, T ;
SOEDA, S ;
TANAKA, H ;
UMEDA, N .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1992, 29 (01) :12-17
[9]
New microsurgical breast reconstruction using free paraumbilical perforator adiposal flaps [J].
Koshima, I ;
Inagawa, K ;
Yamamoto, M ;
Moriguchi, T .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 106 (01) :61-65
[10]
Postoperative morphine requirements of free TRAM and DIEP flaps [J].
Kroll, SS ;
Sharma, S ;
Koutz, C ;
Langstein, HN ;
Evans, GRD ;
Robb, GL ;
Chang, DW ;
Reece, GP .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 107 (02) :338-341