Proliferative markers as prognostic and predictive tools in early breast cancer: where are we now?

被引:231
作者
Colozza, M
Azambuja, E
Cardoso, F
Sotiriou, C
Larsimont, D
Piccart, MJ
机构
[1] Inst Jules Bordet, Med Oncol Clin, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Inst Jules Bordet, Translat Res Unit, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Inst Jules Bordet, Dept Pathol, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[4] SC Oncol Med, I-06132 Perugia, Italy
关键词
breast cancer; proliferative markers; prognostic markers; predictive markers;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdi352
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In the last few decades, proliferative markers have been broadly evaluated as prognostic and predictive factors for early stage breast cancer patients. Several papers evaluating one or more markers have been published, often with contradictory results. As a consequence, there is still uncertainty about the role of these proliferative markers. The present paper critically reviews the current knowledge about the following markers: thymidine labeling index, S phase fraction/flow cytometry, Ki 67, thymidine kinase (TK), cyclins E, cyclin D, the cyclin inhibitors p27 and p21, and topoisomerase II alpha. For each marker, the prognostic and predictive role was separately analyzed. Only papers published in English in peer-reviewed journals before June 2004 that include at least 100 evaluable patients were selected. In addition, the prognostic and predictive role of the proliferative markers had to be assessed through multivariate analyses. One hundred and thirty-two papers fulfilled these criteria and 159 516 patients were analyzed. Unfortunately, several methodological problems in the research to date prevent us from including any one of these proliferative markers among the standard prognostic and predictive factors. Early incorporation of translational research and new technologies with clinical trials are needed to prospectively validate biological markers and allow their use in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1723 / 1739
页数:17
相关论文
共 231 条
[1]   Tumor-specific low molecular weight forms of cyclin E induce genomic instability and resistance to p2l, p27, and antiestrogens in breast cancer [J].
Akli, S ;
Zheng, PJ ;
Multani, AS ;
Wingate, HF ;
Pathak, S ;
Zhang, N ;
Tucker, SL ;
Chang, S ;
Keyomarsi, K .
CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 64 (09) :3198-3208
[2]   p27 deregulation in breast cancer: Prognostic significance and implications for therapy [J].
Alkarain, A ;
Jordan, R ;
Slingerland, J .
JOURNAL OF MAMMARY GLAND BIOLOGY AND NEOPLASIA, 2004, 9 (01) :67-80
[3]   Disease-free survival advantage of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in patients with node-negative, rapidly proliferating breast cancer: A randomized multicenter study [J].
Amadori, D ;
Nanni, O ;
Marangolo, M ;
Pacini, P ;
Ravaioli, A ;
Rossi, A ;
Gambi, A ;
Catalano, G ;
Perroni, D ;
Scarpi, E ;
Giunchi, DC ;
Tienghi, A ;
Becciolini, A ;
Volpi, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (17) :3125-3134
[4]   MAMMALIAN DEOXYRIBONUCLEOSIDE KINASES [J].
ARNER, ESJ ;
ERIKSSON, S .
PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1995, 67 (02) :155-186
[5]   Studies of the potential utility of Ki67 as a predictive molecular marker of clinical response in primary breast cancer [J].
Assersohn, L ;
Salter, J ;
Powles, TJ ;
A'hern, R ;
Makris, A ;
Gregory, RK ;
Chang, J ;
Dowsett, M .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2003, 82 (02) :113-123
[6]   Optimizing flow cytometric DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction as independent prognostic markers for node-negative breast cancer specimens [J].
Bagwell, CB ;
Clark, GM ;
Spyratos, F ;
Chassevent, A ;
Bendahl, PO ;
Stål, O ;
Killander, D ;
Jourdan, ML ;
Romain, S ;
Hunsberger, B ;
Baldetorp, B .
CYTOMETRY, 2001, 46 (03) :121-135
[7]   REPRODUCIBILITY IN DNA FLOW CYTOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF BREAST-CANCER - COMPARISON OF 12 LABORATORIES RESULTS FOR 67 SAMPLE HOMOGENATES [J].
BALDETORP, B ;
BENDAHL, PO ;
FERNO, M ;
ALANEN, K ;
DELLE, U ;
FALKMER, U ;
HANSSONAGGESJO, B ;
HOCKENSTROM, T ;
LINDGREN, A ;
MOSSBERG, L ;
NORDLING, S ;
SIGURDSSON, H ;
STAL, O ;
VISAKORPI, T .
CYTOMETRY, 1995, 22 (02) :115-127
[8]   Improved DNA flow cytometric, DNA ploidy, and S-phase reproducibility between 15 laboratories in analysis of breast cancer using generalized guidelines [J].
Baldetorp, B ;
Bendahl, PO ;
Fernö, M ;
Stål, O .
CYTOMETRY PART A, 2003, 56A (01) :1-7
[9]  
BALSLEV I, 1994, INT J CANCER, V56, P16
[10]  
Barbareschi M, 2000, INT J CANCER, V89, P236, DOI 10.1002/1097-0215(20000520)89:3<236::AID-IJC5>3.3.CO