Small (<=3-cm) renal masses: Detection with CT versus US and pathologic correlation

被引:190
作者
JamisDow, CA
Choyke, PL
Jennings, SB
Linehan, WM
Thakore, KN
Walther, MM
机构
[1] NIH,HENRY M JACKSON FDN,DEPT DIAGNOST RADIOL,BETHESDA,MD 20892
[2] NCI,DIV CANC TREATMENT,MED BRANCH,CLIN ONCOL PROGRAM,BETHESDA,MD 20892
[3] NCI,SURG BRANCH,UROL ONCOL DIV,BETHESDA,MD 20892
关键词
computed tomography (CT); comparative studies; kidney neoplasms; ultrasound; (US); von Hippel-Lindau disease;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.198.3.8628872
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivities of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) for detection and characterization of surgically verified small renal lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease or hereditary papillary renal cancer underwent CT and US before partial nephrectomy or enucleation; 205 renal masses were removed (92% were <3 cm). Detection rates and accuracy of CT and US in the characterization of renal morphology were correlated with lesion size. RESULTS: CT and US detection rates for lesions of 0-5 mm were respectively 47% and 0%; 5-10 mm, 60% and 21%; 10-15 mm, 75% and 28%; 15-20 mm, 100% and 58%; 20-25 mm, 100% and 79%; and 25-30 mm, 100% and 100%. Among the lesions 10-35 mm, 80% and 82% were correctly characterized with CT and US, respectively. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of lesions under 1 cm were not detected with either modality. Neither CT nor US was superior in the characterization of lesions 3 cm or less. CT and particularly US screening studies in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease should be interpreted cautiously because missed or mischaracterized small renal lesions are a frequent problem in these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:785 / 788
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] SMALL RENAL-CELL CARCINOMAS - RESOLVING A DIAGNOSTIC DILEMMA
    AMENDOLA, MA
    BREE, RL
    POLLACK, HM
    FRANCIS, IR
    GLAZER, GM
    JAFRI, SZH
    TOMASZEWSKI, JE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1988, 166 (03) : 637 - 641
  • [3] SMALL RENAL MASSES (LESIONS SMALLER THAN 3-CM) - IMAGING EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT
    CURRY, NS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 164 (02) : 355 - 362
  • [4] SMALL RENAL NEOPLASMS - CLINICAL, PATHOLOGIC, AND IMAGING FEATURES
    LEVINE, E
    HUNTRAKOON, M
    WETZEL, LH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1989, 153 (01) : 69 - 73
  • [5] ACCURACY OF ULTRASOUND IN PREDICTING THE NATURE OF RENAL MASSES
    LINGARD, DA
    LAWSON, TL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1979, 122 (06) : 724 - 727
  • [6] CT OF THE RENAL CYST - IS CYST ASPIRATION NECESSARY
    MCCLENNAN, BL
    STANLEY, RJ
    MELSON, GL
    LEVITT, RG
    SAGEL, SS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1979, 133 (04) : 671 - 675
  • [7] SMALL RENAL-CELL CARCINOMAS - CLINICAL AND IMAGING FEATURES
    PRATI, GF
    SAGGIN, P
    BOSCHIERO, L
    MARTINI, PT
    MONTEMEZZI, S
    MUOLO, A
    [J]. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1993, 51 (01) : 19 - 22
  • [8] COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY OF KIDNEY
    SAGEL, SS
    STANLEY, RJ
    LEVITT, RG
    GEISSE, G
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1977, 124 (02) : 359 - 370
  • [9] SMALL (LESS-THAN-OR-EQUAL-TO-3-CM) RENAL MASSES - CORRELATION OF SPIRAL CT FEATURES AND PATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS
    SILVERMAN, SG
    LEE, BY
    SELTZER, SE
    BLOOM, DA
    CORLESS, CL
    ADAMS, DF
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 163 (03) : 597 - 605
  • [10] SUSSMAN SK, 1993, ABDOM IMAGING, V18, P180