The Evolution of Sex Ratio Adjustment in the Presence of Sexually Antagonistic Selection

被引:20
作者
Blackburn, Gwylim S.
Albert, Arianne Y. K.
Otto, Sarah P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Zool, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
sex allocation; intralocus sexual conflict; inheritance; evolutionary theory; LOCAL RESOURCE COMPETITION; NATURAL-SELECTION; FITNESS CONSEQUENCES; BREEDING SUCCESS; MATE COMPETITION; X-CHROMOSOME; DIMORPHISM; SIZE; CONFLICT; GENES;
D O I
10.1086/655220
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Sex ratio adjustment (SRA) of broods has received widespread interest as a means for optimizing parental investment in offspring. Classical explanations for the evolution of SRA focus on improving offspring fitness in light of resource availability or mate attractiveness. Here, we use genetic models to demonstrate that SRA can evolve to alleviate sexual antagonism by improving the chance that the alleles of a sexually antagonistic trait are transmitted to the sex they benefit. In cases where the trait is autosomally inherited, this result is obtained regardless of whether SRA is based on the mother's or the father's genotype and irrespective of the recombination rate between the trait and SRA loci. SRA also evolves in this manner when the trait is sex-linked, provided that SRA decisions are based on the homogametic genotype (XX mothers or ZZ fathers). By contrast, when based on traits in the heterogametic sex, SRA promotes fixation of the allele that is detrimental to that sex, preventing the evolution of substantial levels of SRA. Our models indicate that the evolution of SRA in nature should be strongly influenced by the genetic architecture of the traits on which it is based and the form of selection affecting them.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 275
页数:12
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   ROOT VOLES - LITTER SEX-RATIO VARIATION IN FRAGMENTED HABITAT [J].
AARS, J ;
ANDREASSEN, HP ;
IMS, RA .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1995, 64 (04) :459-472
[2]   Sexual selection can resolve sex-linked sexual antagonism [J].
Albert, AYK ;
Otto, SP .
SCIENCE, 2005, 310 (5745) :119-121
[3]  
Alonzo SH, 2007, EVOL ECOL RES, V9, P1097
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, The genetical theory of natural selection: a complete variorum edition
[5]  
Badyaev AV, 2000, EVOLUTION, V54, P987
[6]   Growing apart: an ontogenetic perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism [J].
Badyaev, AV .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2002, 17 (08) :369-378
[7]   Sex differences in survival selection in the serin, Serinus serinus [J].
Björklund, M ;
Senar, JC .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2001, 14 (05) :841-849
[8]   NATURAL SELECTION AND THE SEX RATIO [J].
BODMER, WF ;
EDWARDS, AWF .
ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1960, 24 (03) :239-244
[9]   Intralocus sexual conflict [J].
Bonduriansky, Russell ;
Chenoweth, Stephen F. .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2009, 24 (05) :280-288
[10]  
BURLEY N, 1986, EVOLUTION, V40, P1191, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb05744.x