Feasibility study of computed tomography colonography using limited bowel preparation at normal and low-dose levels study

被引:40
作者
Florie, Jasper
van Gelder, Rogier E.
Schutter, Michiel P.
van Randen, Adrienne
Venema, Henk W.
de Jager, Steven
van der Hulst, Victor P. M.
Prent, Anna
Bipat, Shandra
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
Baak, Lubbertus C.
Stoker, Jaap
机构
[1] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Acad Med Ctr, Dept MedicaPhys, NL-1100DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Onze Lieve Vrouw Hosp, Dept Radiol, NL-1090HM Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol, NL-1100DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Onze Lieve Vrouw Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, NL-1090HM Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
CT colonography; fecal tagging; colonic neoplasm; colonoscopy;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-007-0668-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
The purpose was to evaluate low-dose CT colonography without cathartic cleansing in terms of image quality, polyp visualization and patient acceptance. Sixty-one patients scheduled for colonoscopy started a low-fiber diet, lactulose and amidotrizoic-acid for fecal tagging 2 days prior to the CT scan (standard dose, 5.8-8.2 mSv). The original raw data of 51 patients were modified and reconstructed at simulated 2.3 and 0.7 mSv levels. Two observers evaluated the standard dose scan regarding image quality and polyps. A third evaluated the presence of polyps at all three mSv levels in a blinded prospective way. All observers were blinded to the reference standard: colonoscopy. At three times patients were given questionnaires relating to their experiences and preference. Image quality was sufficient in all patients, but significantly lower in the cecum, sigmoid and rectum. The two observers correctly identified respectively 10/15 (67%) and 9/15 (60%) polyps >= 10 mm, with 5 and 8 false-positive lesions (standard dose scan). Dose reduction down to 0.7 mSv was not associated with significant changes in diagnostic value (polyps >= 10 mm). Eighty percent of patients preferred CT colonography and 13% preferred colonoscopy (P < 0.001). CT colonography without cleansing is preferred to colonoscopy and shows sufficient image quality and moderate sensitivity, without impaired diagnostic value at dose-levels as low as 0.7 mSv.
引用
收藏
页码:3112 / 3122
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
Patient experience and preferences toward colon cancer screening: a comparison of virtual colonoscopy and conventional colonoscopy [J].
Akerkar, GA ;
Yee, J ;
Hung, R ;
McQuaid, K .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 54 (03) :310-315
[2]
Low-dose CT colonography in children: initial experience, technical feasibility, and utility [J].
Anupindi, S ;
Perumpillichira, J ;
Israel, EK ;
Zalis, ME ;
Jaramillo, D .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2005, 35 (05) :518-524
[3]
Dry preparation for virtual CT colonography with fecal tagging using water-soluble contrast medium: initial results [J].
Bielen, D ;
Thomeer, M ;
Vanbeckevoort, D ;
Kiss, G ;
Maes, F ;
Marchal, G ;
Rutgeerts, P .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (03) :453-458
[4]
CT colonography without cathartic preparation: Feasibility study [J].
Callstrom, MR ;
Johnson, CD ;
Fletcher, JG ;
Reed, JE ;
Ahlquist, DA ;
Harmsen, WS ;
Tait, K ;
Wilson, LA ;
Corcoran, KE .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (03) :693-698
[5]
Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy) - A multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia [J].
Cotton, PB ;
Durkalski, VL ;
Benoit, PC ;
Palesch, YY ;
Mauldin, PD ;
Hoffman, B ;
Vining, DJ ;
Small, WC ;
Affronti, J ;
Rex, D ;
Kopecky, KK ;
Ackerman, S ;
Burdick, JS ;
Brewington, C ;
Turner, MA ;
Zfass, A ;
Wright, AR ;
Iyer, RB ;
Lynch, P ;
Sivak, MV ;
Butler, H .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (14) :1713-1719
[6]
A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps [J].
Fenlon, HM ;
Nunes, DP ;
Schroy, PC ;
Barish, MA ;
Clarke, PD ;
Ferrucci, JT .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (20) :1496-1503
[7]
Optimization of CT colonography technique: Prospective trial in 180 patients [J].
Fletcher, JG ;
Johnson, CD ;
Welch, TJ ;
MacCarty, RL ;
Ahlquist, DA ;
Reed, JE ;
Harmsen, WS ;
Wilson, LA .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (03) :704-711
[8]
Forbes GM, 2000, ENDOSCOPY, V32, P274
[9]
Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: Prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences [J].
Gluecker, TM ;
Johnson, CD ;
Harmsen, WS ;
Offord, KP ;
Harris, AM ;
Wilson, LA ;
Ahlquist, DA .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 227 (02) :378-384
[10]
Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps [J].
Iannaccone, R ;
Laghi, A ;
Catalano, C ;
Mangiapane, F ;
Lamazza, A ;
Schillaci, A ;
Sinibaldi, G ;
Murakami, T ;
Sammartino, P ;
Hori, M ;
Piacentini, F ;
Nofroni, I ;
Stipa, V ;
Passariello, R .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 127 (05) :1300-1311