Mechanism Experiments and Policy Evaluations

被引:129
作者
Ludwig, Jens [1 ,4 ]
Kling, Jeffrey R. [2 ,4 ]
Mullainathan, Sendhil [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Congress Budget Off, Washington, DC USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; HOUSING VOUCHER EXPERIMENT; STATIN THERAPY; OPPORTUNITY EXPERIMENT; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; FIELD EXPERIMENTS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; CHILD HEALTH; NEIGHBORHOODS; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1257/jep.25.3.17
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Randomized controlled trials are increasingly used to evaluate policies. How can we make these experiments as useful as possible for policy purposes? We argue greater use should be made of experiments that identify the behavioral mechanisms that are central to clearly specified policy questions, what we call "mechanism experiments." These types of experiments can be of great policy value even if the intervention that is tested (or its setting) does not correspond exactly to any realistic policy option.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 38
页数:22
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Allcott Hunt, 2011, EXTERNAL VALID UNPUB
[2]  
ANGRIST JD, 1990, AM ECON REV, V80, P313
[3]  
Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
[4]   The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design is Taking the Con out of Econometrics [J].
Angrist, Joshua D. ;
Pischke, Joern-Steffen .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2010, 24 (02) :3-30
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CHICAGO MAGAZINE JUL
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Free for All? Lessons from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Quasi-experimentation: Design analysis issues for field settings
[8]  
[Anonymous], J EC LIT
[9]  
[Anonymous], STAT ABSTR US
[10]   The Experimental Approach to Development Economics [J].
Banerjee, Abhijit V. ;
Duflo, Esther .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS, 2009, 1 :151-178