Theory of genomic imprinting conflict in social insects

被引:85
作者
Queller, DC [1 ]
机构
[1] Rice Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol MS170, Houston, TX 77005 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2148-3-15
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Genomic imprinting refers to the differential expression of genes inherited from the mother and father (matrigenes and patrigenes). The kinship theory of genomic imprinting treats parent-specific gene expression as products of within-genome conflict. Specifically, matrigenes and patrigenes will be in conflict over treatment of relatives to which they are differently related. Haplodiploid females have many such relatives, and social insects have many contexts in which they affect relatives, so haplodiploid social insects are prime candidates for tests of the kinship theory of imprinting. Results: Matrigenic and patrigenic relatednesses are derived for individuals affected in a variety of contexts, including queen competition, sex ratio, worker laying of male eggs and policing, colony fission, and adoption of new queens. Numerous predictions emerge for what contexts should elicit imprinting, which individuals and tissues will show it, and the direction of imprinting effects. The predictions often vary for different genetic structures (varying queen and mate number) and often contrast with predictions for diploids. Conclusion: Because the contexts differ from the normal imprinting case, and because nothing is currently known about imprinting in social insects, these predictions can serve as a strong a priori test of the kinship theory of imprinting. If the predictions are correct, then social insects, which have long served as exemplars of cooperation between individuals, will also be shown to be extraordinary examples of competition within individual genomes.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
ADAMS J, 1977, GENETICS, V86, P583
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Evolution of social insect colonies, DOI [10.2307/3495984, DOI 10.2307/3495984]
[3]  
[Anonymous], MISC PUBL MUS ZOOL U
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, FRONTIERS MOL BIOL I
[5]  
[Anonymous], OXFORD SURVEYS EVOLU
[6]   Cooperation among unrelated individuals: the ant foundress case [J].
Bernasconi, G ;
Strassmann, JE .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1999, 14 (12) :477-482
[7]  
BOOMSMA JJ, 1990, EVOLUTION, V44, P1026, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb03823.x
[8]  
BOURKE A.F.G., 1995, Social evolution in ants
[9]   Kin conflict over caste determination in social Hymenoptera [J].
Bourke, AFG ;
Ratnieks, FLW .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1999, 46 (05) :287-297
[10]   WORKER REPRODUCTION IN THE HIGHER EUSOCIAL HYMENOPTERA [J].
BOURKE, AFG .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 1988, 63 (03) :291-311