Clinical evaluation of efficacy and safety of a new method for chemo-mechanical removal of caries -: A multi-centre study

被引:134
作者
Ericson, D [1 ]
Zimmerman, M
Raber, H
Götrick, B
Bornstein, R
Thorell, J
机构
[1] Univ Lund, Tandvardshgsk, Fac Dent, Dept Cariol, SE-21421 Malmo, Sweden
[2] Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Hosp Dent, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Inst, Dept Oral Diag, Huddinge, Sweden
[4] Eastman Inst, Dept Paediat Dent, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Biolin Med, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Carisolv; clinical trial; chemo-mechanical removal; dental caries; efficacy; multi-centre study;
D O I
10.1159/000016513
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of a new method (Carisolv(TM)) for chemomechanical removal of caries. At four centres, 137 consecutive patients (64 females and 73 males aged 3-85 years, mean 35) entered a prospective, controlled, randomised open study. One primary caries lesion with distinct dentine involvement was selected per patient. A total of 116 lesions in permanent and 21 in deciduous teeth were selected. Caries was removed with tradition al drilling or the new method. Gel was applied onto the carious dentine and the softened caries gently removed with specially designed hand instruments. New gel was applied and the procedure was repeated until no more debris could be removed and the surface was hard as judged by clinical criteria (probing and visual inspection). An independent examiner judged the cavity being caries-free or not, using clinical criteria. One hundred and thirteen patients were randomised for gel treatment and 24 for drilling. Three patients selected for drilling did not complete the treatment. Total caries removal was achieved in 106 cases with gel and in 19 with drilling. The reasons for incomplete caries removal were step-by-step excavation in 5 cases, unsuccessful caries removal in 1 case for each treatment, while 2 cases refused inspection, Mean (+/- SD) time for caries removal was 10.4 (+/-6.1) min with the gel method and 4.4 (+/-2.2) min with drilling. Mean volume of gel used was 0.4 (+/-0.2) mi. Eighty-two of 107 patients perceived that the new method caused less discomfort compared to drilling. Dentine caries was effectively removed using the Carisolv method without any adverse reactions.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 177
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF PAIN ASSOCIATED WITH MECHANICAL AND CHEMOMECHANICAL REMOVAL OF CARIES [J].
ANUSAVICE, KJ ;
KINCHELOE, JE .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1987, 66 (11) :1680-1683
[2]   DENTAL FEAR AND AVOIDANCE - CAUSES, SYMPTOMS, AND CONSEQUENCES [J].
BERGGREN, U ;
MEYNERT, G .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1984, 109 (02) :247-251
[3]  
Ericson D, 1998, J DENT RES, V77, P1252
[4]   Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): Rationale, technique, and development [J].
Frencken, JE ;
Pilot, T ;
Songpaisan, Y ;
Phantumvanit, P .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH DENTISTRY, 1996, 56 (03) :135-140
[5]   ADULT ATTITUDES TO DENTISTRY AMONG DENTAL ATTENDERS IN SOUTH-WALES [J].
GREEN, RM ;
GREEN, A .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1985, 159 (05) :157-160
[6]  
Habib C M, 1975, Pharmacol Ther Dent, V2, P209
[7]  
Hand R E, 1978, J Endod, V4, P60, DOI 10.1016/S0099-2399(78)80255-6
[8]   Introduction to the symposium on minimal intervention techniques for caries [J].
Horowitz, AM .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH DENTISTRY, 1996, 56 (03) :133-134
[9]  
Keller U, 1997, LASER SURG MED, V20, P32, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1997)20:1<32::AID-LSM5>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-#