Report of the CIMERC/Drexel University Emergency Department Terrorism Preparedness Consensus Panel

被引:25
作者
Greenberg, MI
Hendrickson, RG
机构
[1] Drexel Univ, Coll Med, Dept Emergency Med, Div Med Toxicol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Temple Univ, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[4] Oregon Poison Ctr, Portland, OR USA
关键词
emergency departments; disaster preparedness; terrorism; mass casualty incidents; weapons of mass destruction; recommendations;
D O I
10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00074.x
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
This report describes the consensus recommendations of an expert panel convened to develop recommendations for a hospital-based emergency department (ED) to attain a minimal level of preparedness necessary to respond to mass casualty events derived from the use of weapons of mass destruction. The recommendations were created for use by hospital-based EDs of a variety of sizes and locations (urban, suburban, or rural). The disasters that were considered included those that are biological, chemical, or radiological. The panel focused on preparation for a single disaster that could generate 250-500 total patients in 24-48 hours. This number included asymptomatic, exposed, and symptomatic patients. The panel chose not to address circumstances where a small number of patients with an infectious disease are seen in one or a few hospitals. In addition, the panel believed that preparation of a single hospital for an overwhelming mass casualty situation (e.g., 10,000 Patients) would not be broadly applicable and would not be required for an individual ED to "minimally prepared." Prior to the convening of this consensus panel, in June 2002, a search of all relevant agencies found no comprehensive, published, validated recommendations for preparedness for individual EDs. Although several agencies had released information on disaster management, clinical diagnosis and treatment tools, and training, no agency had produced a comprehensive list of items and issues that individual EDs must consider when preparing for a terrorist attack. The current report attempts to fill this void in information regarding ED preparedness.
引用
收藏
页码:783 / 788
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
*AM COLL EM PHYS, 2001, DIS RESP BIOL CHEM T
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, MMWR RECOMM REP, V51, P1
[3]   Chemical warfare agents: Emergency medical and emergency public health issues [J].
Brennan, RJ ;
Waeckerle, JF ;
Sharp, TW ;
Lillibridge, SR .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 34 (02) :191-204
[4]   Emergency department hazardous materials protocol for contaminated patients [J].
Burgess, JL ;
Kirk, M ;
Borron, SW ;
Cisek, J .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 34 (02) :205-212
[5]  
*CDCP NAT CTR ENV, 2002, NAT PHARM STOCKP WEB
[6]   Emergency department preparedness for the evaluation and treatment of victims of biological or chemical terrorist attack [J].
Greenberg, MI ;
Jurgens, SM ;
Gracely, EJ .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2002, 22 (03) :273-278
[7]   Emergency department impact of the Oklahoma city terrorist bombing [J].
Hogan, DE ;
Waeckerle, JF ;
Dire, DJ ;
Lillibridge, SR .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 34 (02) :160-167
[8]   Anthrax as a biological weapon - Medical and public health management [J].
Inglesby, TV ;
Henderson, DA ;
Bartlett, JG ;
Ascher, MS ;
Eitzen, E ;
Friedlander, AM ;
Hauer, J ;
McDade, J ;
Osterholm, MT ;
O'Toole, T ;
Parker, G ;
Perl, TM ;
Russell, PK ;
Tonat, K .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (18) :1735-1745
[9]  
*JCAHO, 2002, EC14 JCAHO
[10]  
*JCAHO, 2002, EC292 JCAHO