The intra-firm diffusion of new process technologies

被引:57
作者
Battisti, G [1 ]
Stoneman, P
机构
[1] Aston Univ, Aston Business Sch, OIM Grp, Birmingham B4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
关键词
intra-firm diffusion; technological change; innovation; CNC;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijindorg.2004.12.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The study of intra-firm diffusion has largely been neglected and the limited extant literature overwhelmingly relies upon uncertainty reduction via information spreading or epidemic learning as the main driver. In this paper, an alternative approach is taken whereby the intra-firm diffusion of new process technologies reflects the profitability of new technology adoption as proxied by firm characteristics. The approach is tested using data relating to the diffusion of Computer Numerically Controlled Machine tools within firms in the UK engineering and metalworking sectors. The empirical analysis does not reject the hypothesis that profitability considerations are important with a number of firm characteristics being isolated as of special relevance, including firm size and the use of complementary technologies and managerial techniques. However there is little support for the traditional epidemic effect. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 22
页数:22
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1974, DIFFUSION NEW IND PR
[2]  
Antonelli G, 2003, SPRINGER TRAC ADV RO, V1, P109
[3]   Noncapital investment costs and the adoption of CAD and CNC in US metalworking industries [J].
Åstebro, T .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2002, 33 (04) :672-688
[4]   THE EFFECT OF MANAGEMENT AND SOCIAL-INTERACTION ON THE INTRAFIRM DIFFUSION OF ELECTRONIC MAIL SYSTEMS [J].
ASTEBRO, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1995, 42 (04) :319-331
[5]  
BALDWIN JR, 1998, THESIS WARWICK U, P1
[6]  
BATTISTI G, 2003, AM STAT ASS C P NEW
[7]  
Battisti G., 2000, INT REV APPL EC, V14, P254
[8]  
BATTISTI G, 2003, RES POLICY, V1622, P1
[9]  
Bertola G., 1998, Res. Econ, V52, P3, DOI [10.1006/reec.1997.0153, DOI 10.1006/REEC.1997.0153]
[10]  
CAINARCA GC, 1990, SMALL BUSINESS EC, V2, P129