Global study of myoglobin-surfactant interactions

被引:78
作者
Andersen, Kell K. [2 ,3 ]
Westh, Peter [1 ]
Otzen, Daniel E. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Roskilde Univ Ctr, NSM, Res Unit Funct Biomat, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Interdisciplinary Nanosci Ctr, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[3] Aalborg Univ, Dept Life Sci, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1021/la702890y
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Surfactants interact with proteins in multifarious ways which depend on surfactant concentration and structure. To obtain a global overview of this process, we have analyzed the interaction of horse myoglobin (Mb) with an anionic (SDS) and cationic (CTAC) surfactant, using both equilibrium titration techniques and stopped-flow kinetics. Binding and kinetics of conformational changes can be divided into a number of different regions (five below the cmc and one above) with very distinct features (broadly similar between the two surfactants, despite their difference in head group and chain length), which nuance the classical view of biphasic binding prior to micellization. In stage A, fairly weak interactions lead to a linear decrease in thermal stability. This gives way to a more cooperative process in stage B, where aggregates (presumably hemimicelles) start to form on the protein surface, leading to global denaturation (loss of a thermal transition) and biphasic unfolding kinetics. This is consolidated in stage C with titratable surfactant adsorption. Adsorption of this surfactant species leads to significant changes in kinetics, namely, inhibition of unfolding kinetics in CTAC and altered unfolding amplitudes in SDS, though the process is still biphasic in both surfactants. Stage D commences the reduction in exothermic binding signals, leading to further uptake of 5 (SDS) or 31 (CTAC) surfactant molecules without any major changes in protein conformation. In stage E many more surfactant molecules (46 SDS and 39 CTAC) are bound, presumably as quasi-micellar structures, and we observe a very slow unfolding phase in SIDS, which disappears as we reach the cmc. Above the cmc, the unfolding rates remain essentially constant in SDS, but increase significantly in CTAC, possibly because binding of bulk micelles removes the inhibition by hemimicellar aggregates. Our work highlights the fascinating richness of conformational changes that proteins can undergo in the presence of molecules with self-assembling properties.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 407
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Ananthapadmanabhan K., 1993, INTERACTIONS SURFACT, P319, DOI DOI 10.1080/01932699408943565
[2]  
ANTONINI E, 1971, HEMOGLOBIN MYOGLOBIN, P541
[3]   A light scattering investigation of the sodium dodecyl sulfate-lysozyme system [J].
Gimel, JC ;
Brown, W .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 104 (20) :8112-8117
[4]   THEORETICAL APPROACH TO BINDING OF AMPHIPATHIC MOLECULES TO GLOBULAR PROTEINS [J].
JONES, MN .
BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 1975, 151 (01) :109-114
[5]   INTERACTION BETWEEN BOVINE SERUM-ALBUMIN AND SURFACTANTS [J].
JONES, MN ;
SKINNER, HA ;
TIPPING, E .
BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 1975, 147 (02) :229-234
[6]   ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ON VIBRONIC BAND INTENSITIES IN PYRENE MONOMER FLUORESCENCE AND THEIR APPLICATION IN STUDIES OF MICELLAR SYSTEMS [J].
KALYANASUNDARAM, K ;
THOMAS, JK .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1977, 99 (07) :2039-2044
[7]   Polymer-surfactant and protein-surfactant interactions [J].
La Mesa, C .
JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2005, 286 (01) :148-157
[8]   Analysis of the SDS-lysozyme binding isotherm [J].
Lad, MD ;
Ledger, VM ;
Briggs, B ;
Green, RJ ;
Frazier, RA .
LANGMUIR, 2003, 19 (12) :5098-5103
[9]   Extensive unfolding of the C-LytA choline-binding module by submicellar concentrations of sodium dodecyl sulphate [J].
Maestro, Beatriz ;
Sanz, Jesus M. .
FEBS LETTERS, 2007, 581 (03) :375-381
[10]   Analysis of protein-surfactant interactions -: a titration calorimetric and fluorescence spectroscopic investigation of interactions between Humicola insolens cutinase and an anionic surfactant [J].
Nielsen, AD ;
Arleth, L ;
Westh, P .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-PROTEINS AND PROTEOMICS, 2005, 1752 (02) :124-132