Is neoclassical economics still entrepreneurless?

被引:51
作者
Bianchi, M [1 ]
Henrekson, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Sch Econ, Dept Econ, SE-11383 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.0023-5962.2005.00292.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The paper reviews and evaluates some recent contributions on modeling entrepreneurship within a neoclassical framework, analyzing how, and to what extent, the fundamental ingredients suggested in the social science literature were captured. It is shown how these approaches are important in stressing the main elements of a complex picture, without being able to fully describe it. Each modeling attempt focuses only on one specific feature of entrepreneurship, and the entrepreneurial function, broadly perceived, eludes analytical tractability. As a consequence, the models can be useful in analyzing the effect of entrepreneurial behavior at an aggregate level, but not at explaining individual choices. From these observations, it is highlighted how a simplistic interpretation of the existing mainstream approaches incorporating entrepreneurship runs the risk of leading to distortionary policy interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 377
页数:25
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
ACEMOGLU D, 2005, IN PRESS J EUROPEAN
[2]  
Acemoglu D., 2004, NBER WORKING PAPER
[3]   Endogenous matching and the empirical determinants of contract form [J].
Ackerberg, DA ;
Botticini, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2002, 110 (03) :564-591
[4]  
Acs Z.J., 2004, 4783 CTR EC POL RES
[5]  
Acs Z.J., 2003, HDB ENTREPRENEURSHIP
[6]  
ACS ZJ, 1988, AM ECON REV, V78, P678
[7]   A MODEL OF GROWTH THROUGH CREATIVE DESTRUCTION [J].
AGHION, P ;
HOWITT, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 1992, 60 (02) :323-351
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2004, COGNITIVE MECH EC DE
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2000, ADV ENTREPRENEURSHIP
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Are Small Firms Important?