Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes

被引:4396
作者
Lewis, EJ
Hunsicker, LG
Clarke, WR
Berl, T
Pohl, MA
Lewis, JB
Ritz, E
Atkins, RC
Rohde, R
Raz, I
机构
[1] Rush Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Dept Med, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Iowa City, IA USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Denver, CO USA
[5] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Med, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[6] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Nashville, TN 37212 USA
[7] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Med, Heidelberg, Germany
[8] Monash Med Ctr, Dept Nephrol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Hadassah Univ, Dept Med, Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa011303
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background It is unknown whether either the angiotensin-II-receptor blocker irbesartan or the calcium-channel blocker amlodipine slows the progression of nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes independently of its capacity to lower the systemic blood pressure. Methods We randomly assigned 1715 hypertensive patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes to treatment with irbesartan ( 300 mg daily), amlodipine (10 mg daily), or placebo. The target blood pressure was 135/85 mm Hg or less in all groups. We compared the groups with regard to the time to the primary composite end point of a doubling of the base-line rum creatinine concentration, the development of endstage renal disease, or death from any cause. We also compared them with regard to the time to a secondary cardiovascular composite end point. Results The mean duration of follow-up was 2.6 years. Treatment with irbesartan was associated with a risk of the primary composite end point that was 20 percent lower than that in the placebo group ( P= 0.02) and 23 percent lower than that in the amlodipine group ( P= 0.006). The risk of a doubling of the serum concentration was 33 percent lower in the irbesartan group than in the placebo group ( P= 0.003) and 37 percent lower in the irbesartan group than in the amlodipine group ( P<0.001). Treatment with irbesartan was associated with a relative risk of end-stage renal disease that was 23 percent lower than that in both other groups ( P= 0.07 for both comparisons). These differences were not explained by differences in the blood pressures that were achieved. The serum creatinine concentration increased 24 percent more slowly in the irbesartan group than in the placebo group ( P= 0.008) and 21 percent more slowly than in the amlodipine group (P=0.02). There were no significant differences in the rates of death from any cause or in the cardiovascular composite end point. Conclusions The angiotensin-II receptor blocker irbesartan is effective in protecting against the of nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. This protection is independent of the reduction in blood pressure it causes. (N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 851-60.) Copyright (C) 2001 Massachusetts Medical Society.
引用
收藏
页码:851 / 860
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Abbate M, 1998, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V9, P1213
  • [2] Effect of diuretic-based antihypertensive treatment on cardiovascular disease risk in older diabetic patients with isolated systolic hypertension
    Curb, JD
    Pressel, SL
    Cutler, JA
    Savage, PJ
    Applegate, WB
    Black, H
    Camel, G
    Davis, BR
    Frost, PH
    Gonzalez, N
    Guthrie, G
    Oberman, A
    Rutan, GH
    Stamler, J
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (23): : 1886 - 1892
  • [3] Randomised trial of old and new antihypertensive drugs in elderly patients:: cardiovascular mortality and morbidity the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension-2 study
    Hansson, L
    Lindholm, LH
    Ekbom, T
    Dahlöf, B
    Lanke, J
    Scherstén, B
    Wester, PO
    Hedner, T
    de Faire, U
    [J]. LANCET, 1999, 354 (9192) : 1751 - 1756
  • [4] Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension:: principal results of the hypertension optimal treatment (HOT) randomised trial
    Hansson, L
    Zanchetti, A
    Carruthers, SG
    Dahlöf, B
    Elmfeldt, D
    Julius, S
    Ménard, J
    Rahn, KH
    Wedel, H
    Westerling, S
    [J]. LANCET, 1998, 351 (9118) : 1755 - 1762
  • [5] ANGIOTENSIN-II STIMULATES EXTRACELLULAR-MATRIX PROTEIN-SYNTHESIS THROUGH INDUCTION OF TRANSFORMING GROWTH-FACTOR-BETA EXPRESSION IN RAT GLOMERULAR MESANGIAL CELLS
    KAGAMI, S
    BORDER, WA
    MILLER, DE
    NOBLE, NA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1994, 93 (06) : 2431 - 2437
  • [6] BRADYKININ CAUSES SELECTIVE EFFERENT ARTERIOLAR DILATION DURING ANGIOTENSIN-I CONVERTING-ENZYME INHIBITION
    KON, V
    FOGO, A
    ICHIKAWA, I
    HELLINGS, SE
    BILLS, T
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1993, 44 (03) : 545 - 550
  • [7] DISCRETE SEQUENTIAL BOUNDARIES FOR CLINICAL-TRIALS
    LAN, KKG
    DEMETS, DL
    [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 1983, 70 (03) : 659 - 663
  • [8] LEE ET, 1992, STATISTICAL METHODS, P250
  • [9] LEE ET, 1992, STAT METHODS SURVIVA, P67
  • [10] THE EFFECT OF ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING ENZYME-INHIBITION ON DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY
    LEWIS, EJ
    HUNSICKER, LG
    BAIN, RP
    ROHDE, RD
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 329 (20) : 1456 - 1462