Value of endorectal MRI and MRS in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and previous negative biopsies to localize peripheral zone tumours

被引:70
作者
Cirillo, S. [1 ]
Petracchini, M. [1 ]
Della Monica, P. [1 ]
Gallo, T. [1 ]
Tartaglia, V. [1 ]
Vestita, E. [2 ]
Ferrando, U. [3 ]
Regge, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Canc Res & Treatment, Radiol Unit, I-10060 Turin, Italy
[2] Ivrea Hosp, Dept Urol, Turin, Italy
[3] San Giovanni Battista Hosp, Dept Urol, Turin, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2007.10.020
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
AIM: To evaluate prospectively the rote of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in detecting peripheral zone tumour in patients with total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values >= 4 ng/ml. and one or more negative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy rounds. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-four consecutive men (mean age 65.4 +/- 5.2 years, mean total PSA 10.8 +/- 7.5 ng/ml), underwent a combined MRI-MRS examination with endorectal coil. MRI included transverse, coronal, and sagittal T2-weighted and transverse T1-weighted fast spin-echo sequences. MRS data were acquired using a double spin-echo point resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) sequence. A 10-site scheme was adopted to evaluate the prostate peripheral zone. A peripheral prostatic site was classified as suspicious if tow intensity signal was present on T2-weighted images and/or if the choline + creatine/citrate ratio was >0.86. Following MRI-MRS all patients were submitted to a standard 10-core biopsy scheme to which from one to three supplementary samples were added from suspicious MRI and/or MRS sites. In per-patient analysis findings were considered true-positive if biopsy positive patients were classified as suspicious, irrespectively of lesion site indication. RESULTS: Prostate cancer (PC) was detected in 17 of 54 patients (31.5%); median Gleason score was 6 (range 4-8). On a per-patient basis sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were respectively 100, 64.9, 56.7, 100, and 75.9% for MRI; 82.2, 70.3, 57.7, 92.9, and 75.9% for MRS; and 100, 51.4, 48.6, 100, and 66.7% for combined MRI-MRS. In all the 17 PC patients, combined MRI-MRS correctly indicated the sites harbouring cancer, whereas both MRI and MRS gave erroneous indications in two patients. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study show that MRI atone might be able to select negative patients in whom further biopsies are unnecessary. The combination of MRI and MRS might be able to drive biopsies in suspicious sites and increase the cancer detection rate. Further studies are required to confirm these data. (C) 2008 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:871 / 879
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
Negative prostatic biopsies in patients with a high risk of prostate cancer -: Is the combination of endorectal MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) a useful tool?: A preliminary study [J].
Amsellem-Ouazana, D ;
Younes, P ;
Conquy, S ;
Peyromaure, M ;
Flam, T ;
Debré, B ;
Zerbib, M .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 47 (05) :582-586
[2]
MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies [J].
Anastasiadis, Aristotelis G. ;
Lichy, Matthias P. ;
Nagele, Udo ;
Kuczyk, Markus A. ;
Merseburger, Axel S. ;
Hennenlotter, Joerg ;
Corvin, Stefan ;
Sievert, Karl-Dietrich ;
Claussen, Claus D. ;
Stenzl, Arnulf ;
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 50 (04) :738-749
[3]
MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5 T: Initial results [J].
Beyersdorff, D ;
Winkel, A ;
Hamm, B ;
Lenk, S ;
Loening, SA ;
Taupitz, M .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (02) :576-581
[4]
Patients with a history of elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and negative transrectal US-guided quadrant or sextant biopsy results: Value of MR imaging [J].
Beyersdorff, D ;
Taupitz, M ;
Winkelmann, B ;
Fischer, T ;
Lenk, S ;
Loening, SA ;
Hamm, B .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (03) :701-706
[5]
Prostate cancer tumor volume: Measurement with endorectal MR and MR spectroscopic imaging [J].
Coakley, FV ;
Kurhanewicz, J ;
Lu, Y ;
Jones, KD ;
Swanson, MG ;
Chang, SD ;
Carroll, PR ;
Hricak, H .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 223 (01) :91-97
[6]
Epidemiology of prostate cancer [J].
Crawford, ED .
UROLOGY, 2003, 62 (6A) :3-12
[7]
Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: When should we stop? [J].
Djavan, B ;
Ravery, V ;
Zlotta, A ;
Dobronski, P ;
Dobrovits, M ;
Fakhari, M ;
Seitz, C ;
Susani, M ;
Borkowski, A ;
Boccon-Gibod, L ;
Schulman, CC ;
Marberger, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (05) :1679-1683
[8]
Repeat prostate biopsy: Who, how and when? A review [J].
Djavan, B ;
Remzi, M ;
Schulman, CC ;
Marberger, M ;
Zlotta, AR .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2002, 42 (02) :93-103
[9]
Prostate cancer. Epidemiology. Risk factors. Pathology [J].
Fournier, G ;
Valeri, A ;
Mangin, P ;
Cussenot, O .
ANNALES D UROLOGIE, 2004, 38 (05) :187-206
[10]
Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging [J].
Fuetterer, Jurgen J. ;
Heijmink, Stijn W. T. P. J. ;
Scheenen, Tom W. J. ;
Veltman, Jeroen ;
Huisman, Henkjan J. ;
Vos, Pieter ;
Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, Christina A. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Krabbe, Paul F. M. ;
Heerschap, Arend ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 241 (02) :449-458