Integrating fuzzy theory and hierarchy concepts to evaluate software quality

被引:60
作者
Chang, Che-Wei [1 ]
Wu, Cheng-Ru [2 ]
Lin, Hung-Lung [3 ]
机构
[1] Yuanpei Univ, Dept Informat & Management, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
[2] Yuanpei Univ, Grad Inst Business Management, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
[3] Natl Cent Univ, Dept Business Adm, Jhongli 320, Taoyuan County, Taiwan
关键词
software quality characteristics; software quality model; evaluating the software quality; fuzzy analytic hierarchy process; FMADM;
D O I
10.1007/s11219-007-9035-2
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This study proposes a software quality evaluation model and its computing algorithm. Existing software quality evaluation models examine multiple characteristics and are characterized by factorial fuzziness. The relevant criteria of this model are derived from the international norm ISO. The main objective of this paper is to propose a novel Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach for addressing uncertainty and imprecision in service evaluation during pre-negotiation stages, where comparative judgments of decision makers are represented as fuzzy triangular numbers. A new fuzzy prioritization method, which derives crisp priorities from consistent and inconsistent fuzzy comparison matrices, is proposed. The Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP)-based decision-making method can provide decision makers or buyers with a valuable guideline for evaluating software quality. Importantly, the proposed model can aids users and developers in assessing software quality, making it highly applicable for academic and commercial purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 276
页数:14
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   FUZZY HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS [J].
BUCKLEY, JJ .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 17 (03) :233-247
[2]  
CESAR GP, 2005, SOFTW QUAL J, V13, P195
[3]   Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison [J].
Deng, HP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 1999, 21 (03) :215-231
[4]  
DEUTSCH MS, 1998, SOFTWARE QUALITY ENG
[5]  
*ISO IEC, 2001, IEOIEC91261
[6]   An instrument for the measurement of customer perceptions of quality management in the software industry: An empirical study in India [J].
Issac, George ;
Rajendran, Chandrasekharan ;
Anantharaman, R. N. .
SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL, 2006, 14 (04) :291-308
[7]   A basis for analyzing software architecture analysis methods [J].
Kazman, R ;
Bass, L ;
Klein, M ;
Lattanze, T ;
Northrop, L .
SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL, 2005, 13 (04) :329-355
[8]   An empirical study of predicting software faults with case-based reasoning [J].
Khoshgoftaar, Taghi M. ;
Seliya, Naeem ;
Sundaresh, Nandini .
SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL, 2006, 14 (02) :85-111
[9]   Resource oriented selection of rule-based classification models: An empirical case study [J].
Khoshgoftaar, Taghi M. ;
Herzberg, Angela ;
Seliya, Naeem .
SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL, 2006, 14 (04) :309-338
[10]  
KIMA SS, 2005, BUILD ENVIRON, V40, P1103