On the effect of communication delays in failure diagnosis of decentralized discrete event systems

被引:33
作者
Debouk, R [1 ]
Lafortune, S [1 ]
Teneketzis, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
DISCRETE EVENT DYNAMIC SYSTEMS-THEORY AND APPLICATIONS | 2003年 / 13卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
failure diagnosis; discrete event systems; decentralized information; diagnostic protocols; communication delays;
D O I
10.1023/A:1024007808984
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
We study the effect of communication delays on the performance of a coordinated decentralized architecture for failure diagnosis of untimed discrete event systems. The architecture consists of local sites communicating with a coordinator that is responsible for diagnosing the failures occurring in the system. A protocol that realizes the architecture is defined by the diagnostic information generated at the local sites, the communication rules used by the local sites, and the decision rule used by the coordinator to infer the occurrence of failures. Our prior work (Debouk et al., 2000) has addressed the performance of a set of protocols under the assumption that messages are received by the coordinator in the order in which they are sent globally. In this work we relax the abovementioned assumption. We modify the coordinator's decision rule for two of the protocols analyzed in Debouk et al. (2000) to account for the reception of out of order messages. We discover conditions on the system structure under which the modified protocols perform as well as the centralized diagnostic scheme proposed in Sampath et al. (1995).
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 289
页数:27
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Fault detection and diagnosis in distributed systems: An approach by partially stochastic Petri nets [J].
Aghasaryan, A ;
Fabre, E ;
Benveniste, A ;
Boubour, R ;
Jard, C .
DISCRETE EVENT DYNAMIC SYSTEMS-THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1998, 8 (02) :203-231
[2]   Diagnosis of large active systems [J].
Baroni, P ;
Lamperti, G ;
Pogliano, P ;
Zanella, M .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1999, 110 (01) :135-183
[3]  
Bertsekas D. P., 1992, DATA NETWORKS
[4]  
Deb S, 1998, IEEE SYS MAN CYBERN, P2998, DOI 10.1109/ICSMC.1998.725120
[5]   Coordinated decentralized protocols for failure diagnosis of discrete event systems [J].
Debouk, R ;
Lafortune, S ;
Teneketzis, D .
DISCRETE EVENT DYNAMIC SYSTEMS-THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2000, 10 (1-2) :33-86
[6]  
DEBOUK R, 2000, THESIS U MICHIGAN
[7]  
Fabre E, 2000, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P2252, DOI 10.1109/CDC.2000.914132
[8]  
HOLLOWAY LE, 1994, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1994 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, P701
[9]   A DISTRIBUTED FAULT-DIAGNOSIS METHOD BASED ON DIGRAPH MODELS - STEADY-STATE ANALYSIS [J].
MOHINDRA, S ;
CLARK, PA .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1993, 17 (02) :193-209
[10]  
Pencole Y, 2000, P 11 INT WORKSH PRIN, P185