Acceptability of the Distress Thermometer and Problem List to community-based telephone cancer helpline operators, and to cancer patients and carers

被引:39
作者
Hughes, Karen L. [4 ]
Sargeant, Hilary [3 ]
Hawkes, Anna L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Canc Council Queensland, Viertel Ctr Res Canc Control, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Publ Hlth, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
[3] Canc Council Queensland, Canc Counselling Serv, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
来源
BMC CANCER | 2011年 / 11卷
关键词
MARROW TRANSPLANT PATIENTS; DIAGNOSED BREAST-CANCER; RAPID-SCREENING MEASURE; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS; ADJUSTMENT DISORDERS; MAJOR DEPRESSION; VALIDATION; MULTICENTER; PREVALENCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2407-11-46
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Cancer can be a distressing experience for cancer patients and carers, impacting on psychological, social, physical and spiritual functioning. However, health professionals often fail to detect distress in their patients due to time constraints and a lack of experience. Also, with the focus on the patient, carer needs are often overlooked. This study investigated the acceptability of brief distress screening with the Distress Thermometer (DT) and Problem List (PL) to operators of a community-based telephone helpline, as well as to cancer patients and carers calling the service. Methods: Operators (n = 18) monitored usage of the DT and PL with callers (cancer patients/carers, >18 years, and English-speaking) from September-December 2006 (n = 666). The DT is a single item, 11-point scale to rate level of distress. The associated PL identifies the cause of distress. Results: The DT and PL were used on 90% of eligible callers, most providing valid responses. Benefits included having an objective, structured and consistent means for distress screening and triage to supportive care services. Reported challenges included apparent inappropriateness of the tools due to the nature of the call or level of caller distress, the DT numeric scale, and the level of operator training. Conclusions: We observed positive outcomes to using the DT and PL, although operators reported some challenges. Overcoming these challenges may improve distress screening particularly by less experienced clinicians, and further development of the PL items and DT scale may assist with administration. The DT and PL allow clinicians to direct/prioritise interventions or referrals, although ongoing training and support is critical in distress screening.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Development of an impact thermometer for use in combination with the distress thermometer as a brief screening tool for adjustment disorders and/or major depression in cancer patients [J].
Akizuki, N ;
Yamawaki, S ;
Akechi, T ;
Nakano, T ;
Uchitomi, Y .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2005, 29 (01) :91-99
[2]   Development of a brief screening interview for adjustment disorders and major depression in patients with cancer [J].
Akizuki, N ;
Akechi, T ;
Nakanishi, T ;
Yoshikawa, E ;
Okamura, M ;
Nakano, T ;
Murakami, Y ;
Uchitomi, Y .
CANCER, 2003, 97 (10) :2605-2613
[3]  
Andersen B., 2001, Psychosocial Interventions for Cancer, V1, P119, DOI DOI 10.1037/10402-007
[4]   Cancer distress screening - Needs, models, and methods [J].
Carlson, LE ;
Bultz, BD .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2003, 55 (05) :403-409
[5]  
Dabrowski Michele, 2007, J Natl Compr Canc Netw, V5, P104
[6]  
Donovan KA, 2004, PSYCHO-ONCOL, V13, pS16
[7]  
Frost MH, 2000, PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, V9, P221
[8]  
Fulcher Caryl D, 2007, Clin J Oncol Nurs, V11, P817, DOI 10.1188/07.CJON.817-821
[9]   Screening for distress in cancer patients: is the distress thermometer a valid measure in the UK and does it measure change over time? A prospective validation study [J].
Gessler, S. ;
Low, J. ;
Daniells, E. ;
Williams, R. ;
Brough, V. ;
Tookman, A. ;
Jones, L. .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2008, 17 (06) :538-547
[10]   Use of distress and depression thermometers to measure psychosocial morbidity among southern European cancer patients [J].
Gil, F ;
Grassi, L ;
Travado, L ;
Tomamichel, M ;
Gonzalez, JR .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2005, 13 (08) :600-606