Do online information retrieval systems help experienced clinicians answer clinical questions?

被引:98
作者
Westbrook, JI
Coiera, EW
Gosling, AS
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Ctr Hlth Informat, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Univ London Royal Holloway & Bedford New Coll, Dept Psychol, Surrey, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1197/jamia.M1717
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the impact of clinicians' use of an online information retrieval system on their performance in answering clinical questions. Design: Pre-/post-intervention experimental design. Measurements: In a computer laboratory, 75 clinicians (26 hospital-based doctors, 18 family practitioners, and 31 clinical nurse consultants) provided 600 answers to eight clinical scenarios before and after the use of an online information retrieval system. We examined the proportion of correct answers pre- and post-intervention, direction of change in answers, and differences between professional groups. Results: System,use resulted in a 21% improvement in clinicians' answers, from 29% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.432.6) correct pre- to 50% (95% Cl 46.0-54.0) post-system use. In 33% (95% Cl 29.1-36.9) answers were changed from incorrect to correct. In 21% (95% Cl 17.1-23.9) correct pre-test answers were supported by evidence found using the system, and in 7% (95% Cl 4.9-9.1) correct pre-test answers were changed incorrectly. For 40% (35.4-43.6) of scenarios, incorrect pre-test answers were not rectified following system use. Despite significant differences in professional groups' pre-test scores [family practitioners: 41% (95% Cl 33.0-49.0), hospital doctors: 35% (95% Cl 28.5-41.2), and clinical nurse consultants: 17% (95% Cl 12.3-21.7; X 2 = 29.0, df = 2, p < 0.01)], there was no difference in post-test scores. (x(2) = 2.6, df = 2, p = 0.73). Conclusions: The use of an online information retrieval system was associated with a significant improvement in the quality of answers provided by clinicians to typical clinical problems. In a small proportion of cases, use of the system produced errors. While there was variation in the performance of clinical groups when answering questions unaided, performance did not differ significantly following system use. Online information retrieval systems can be an effective tool in improving the accuracy of clinicians' answers to clinical questions.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 321
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Altman DG, 1990, PRACTICAL STAT MED R
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, EVALUATION METHODS M
[3]   Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: The nature of patient care information system-related errors [J].
Ash, JS ;
Berg, M ;
Coiera, E .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2004, 11 (02) :104-112
[4]  
CIMINO JJ, 2003, AM MED INF ASS S
[5]  
Coiera E., 2003, GUIDE HLTH INFORMATI
[6]  
Elstein A.S., 1978, MED PROBLEM SOLVING, DOI DOI 10.4159/HARVARD.9780674189089
[7]   Evidence base of clinical diagnosis - Clinical problem solving and diagnostic decision making: selective review of the cognitive literature [J].
Elstein, AS ;
Schwarz, A .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7339) :729-732
[8]  
GORMAN PN, 1994, B MED LIBR ASSOC, V82, P140
[9]   Nurses' use of online clinical evidence [J].
Gosling, AS ;
Westbrook, JI ;
Spencer, R .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2004, 47 (02) :201-211
[10]   ONLINE ACCESS TO MEDLINE IN CLINICAL SETTINGS - A STUDY OF USE AND USEFULNESS [J].
HAYNES, RB ;
MCKIBBON, KA ;
WALKER, CJ ;
RYAN, N ;
FITZGERALD, D ;
RAMSDEN, MF .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 112 (01) :78-84