Lay explanations for poverty in Turkey and their determinants

被引:36
作者
Morcol, G [1 ]
机构
[1] MIDDLE E TECH UNIV,ANKARA,TURKEY
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00224549709595494
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The external and internal causal attributions for poverty in Turkey were examined in an exploratory survey. Factor analysis results confirmed Feagin's 3 conceptual categories (1975) of explanations for poverty: structural, fatalistic, and individualistic. Income, gender, age, and education were important determinants of explanations for poverty. All income groups favored structural (external) explanations. Poor persons preferred more tangible structural explanations, and nonpoor persons gave more abstract structural explanations. Poor persons also favored fatalistic (external) explanations more than higher income groups did. Women and older people offered individualistic and fatalistic explanations more than others. Men and people with higher levels of education preferred abstract structural explanations more than others.
引用
收藏
页码:728 / 738
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1967, POLITICAL BELIEFS AM
[2]  
[Anonymous], BELIEFS INEQUALITY
[3]  
BERNSTEIN DA, 1991, PSYCHOLOGY
[4]  
*COMM EUR COMM, 1977, PERC POV EUR
[5]  
Feagin J., 1975, SUBORDINATING POOR P
[6]  
FEAGIN JR, 1972, PSYCHOL TODAY, V6, P101
[7]   EXPLANATIONS OF POVERTY IN AUSTRALIAN AND AMERICAN SAMPLES - PERSON, SOCIETY, OR FATE [J].
FEATHER, NT .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 26 (03) :199-216
[9]  
*GALL REP, 1985, 234 GALL
[10]  
HARPER D, 1991, PSYCHOL DEV SOC, V3, P193