A systematic observational study of teachers' and pupils' behaviour in large and small classes

被引:43
作者
Blatchford, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London, Inst Educ, London, England
关键词
class size; teacher-pupil interaction; pupil attentiveness;
D O I
10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00043-9
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research and debate on class size differences have focused on relations with achievement and there is little relevant research on what mediating classroom processes might be involved. This paper investigates connections between class size and three aspects of teacher and child behaviour in class: teacher-child interactions, pupil attentiveness and off-task behaviour, and peer relations in class. It reports on a systematic observational study of large (average 33 children) and small (average 19 children) reception classes (children aged 4-5 years). Data come from a sub-sample of 235 children in 39 classes drawn from a longitudinal study of two cohorts of over 10,000 children for three years after entry to English infant schools (aged 4-7 years). Results show that teacher-child contacts are more frequent and personalized in small classes, but that children are more likely to be off-task in large classes (whether with the teacher, other children or when not interacting), and interact more extensively with their peers (through work as well as social contacts). The results raise questions about direct models of teacher effects, and suggest that class size is one contextual influence that presents difficulties and opportunities for teachers and children. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:569 / 595
页数:27
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CONT ED
[2]  
[Anonymous], TEACHERS SCH ACHIEVE
[3]  
[Anonymous], HDB RES TEACHING
[4]  
[Anonymous], LEARNING THINK
[6]  
*AV ED DEP I ED, 1996, AV REC ENTR ASS
[7]  
Bassey M., 1996, RES INTELLIGENCE, V55, P30
[8]  
Bennett N., 1984, The quality of pupil learning experiences
[9]  
Bennett N., 1996, BRIT ED RES, V22, P33, DOI [10.1080/0141192960220103, DOI 10.1080/0141192960220103]
[10]  
Betts JR, 1999, EDUC EVAL POLICY AN, V21, P193, DOI 10.3102/01623737021002193