Temozolomide in combination with BCNU before and after radiotherapy in patients with inoperable newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme

被引:40
作者
Barrié, M
Couprie, C
Dufour, H
Figarella-Branger, D
Muracciole, X
Hoang-Xuan, K
Braguer, D
Martin, PM
Peragut, JC
Grisoli, F
Chinot, O
机构
[1] CHU Timone, Unite Neurooncol, Serv Neurochirurg, Assistance Pub Hop Marseille, Marseille, France
[2] CHU Timone, Serv Pharm, Anat Pathol Lab, Marseille, France
[3] CHU Timone, Serv Radiotherapie, Marseille, France
[4] CHU Pitie Salpetriere, Dept Neurol, Paris, France
[5] Univ Mediterranee, Fac Med Marseille, Lab Cancerol Expt, INSERM,EMI 0359, Marseille, France
关键词
3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU); chemotherapy neo-adjuvant strategy; glioblastoma; inoperable brain tumor; temozolomide;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdi225
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carmustine (BCNU) in combination with temozolomide as first-line chemotherapy before and after radiotherapy (RT) in patients with inoperable, newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Patients and methods: Forty patients were treated with BCNU (150 mg/m(2)) on day 1 and temozolomide (110 mg/m(2)/day) on days 1 through 5 of each 42-day cycle for up to four cycles prior to conventional RT (2 Gy fractions to a total of 60 Gy). After RT, BCNU +temozolomide was administered for four additional cycles or until progression. The primary end point was response rate; secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: Sixty per cent of patients completed four cycles of neo-adjuvant BCNU +temozolomide. Objective response rate (intention-to-treat) was 42.5% (95% confidence interval 27% to 58%), including two (5%) complete and 15 (37.5%) partial responses. In the eligible population (n=37) the objective response rate was 46%. Nine (24%) patients had stable disease and 14 (35%) had progressive disease. Median PFS and OS were 7.4 and 12.7 months, respectively. Age was the only significant prognostic factor and tumor location (lobar versus multifocal versus corpus callosum) showed a trend. Grade 3-4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia (n=11) and neutropenia (n=7) for both pre- and post-RT chemotherapy. Four patients required platelet transfusions. No patient discontinued treatment because of toxicity. Conclusions: The combination of BCNU plus temozolomide as neo-adjuvant therapy in inoperable GBM exhibited promising activity with a good safety profile and warrants further evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:1177 / 1184
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Afra D, 2002, LANCET, V359, P1011
[2]  
CHANG CH, 1983, CANCER, V52, P997, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19830915)52:6<997::AID-CNCR2820520612>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-2
[4]   Phase II study of neoadjuvant 1, 3-bis (2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea and temozolomide for newly diagnosed anaplastic glioma - A North American Brain Tumor Consortium Trial [J].
Chang, SM ;
Prados, MD ;
Yung, WKA ;
Fine, H ;
Junck, L ;
Greenberg, H ;
Robins, HI ;
Mehta, M ;
Fink, KL ;
Jaeckle, KA ;
Kuhn, J ;
Hess, K ;
Schold, C .
CANCER, 2004, 100 (08) :1712-1716
[5]  
CHINOT O, 2003, 39 ANN M AM SOC CLIN, V108
[6]   Should radiotherapy be standard therapy for brain tumors in the elderly? Cons [J].
Chinot, OL .
SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2003, 30 (06) :68-71
[7]   SURVIVAL AFTER STEREOTACTIC BIOPSY OF MALIGNANT GLIOMAS [J].
COFFEY, RJ ;
LUNSFORD, LD ;
TAYLOR, FH .
NEUROSURGERY, 1988, 22 (03) :465-473
[8]   RECURSIVE PARTITIONING ANALYSIS OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN 3 RADIATION-THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP MALIGNANT GLIOMA TRIALS [J].
CURRAN, WJ ;
SCOTT, CB ;
HORTON, J ;
NELSON, JS ;
WEINSTEIN, AS ;
FISCHBACH, AJ ;
CHANG, CH ;
ROTMAN, M ;
ASBELL, SO ;
KRISCH, RE ;
NELSON, DF .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (09) :704-710
[9]  
Dazzi C, 2000, ANTICANCER RES, V20, P515
[10]   Up-front chemotherapy with fotemustine (F)/cisplatin (CDDP)/etoposide (VP16) regimen in the treatment of 33 non-removable glioblastomas [J].
Frenay, M ;
Lebrun, C ;
Lonjon, M ;
Bondiau, PY ;
Chatel, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 36 (08) :1026-1031