Low-dose antihypertensive therapy with 1.5 mg sustained-release indapamide:: results of randomised double-blind controlled studies

被引:64
作者
Ambrosioni, E
Safar, M
Degaute, JP
Malin, PL
MacMahon, M
Pujol, DR
de Cordoüe, A
Guez, D
机构
[1] Inst Rech Int Servier, F-92415 Courbevoie, France
[2] Univ Bologna, Policlin S Orsola, Div Med Interna, Bologna, Italy
[3] Hop Broussais, Dept Internal Med, Paris, France
[4] Free Univ Brussels, Erasmus Hosp, Hypertens Clin, Brussels, Belgium
[5] Wexham Pk Hosp, Chiltern Res, Slough SL2 4HL, Berks, England
[6] Alcala Henares Univ, Principe Asturias Hosp, Madrid, Spain
关键词
hypertension; low-dose diuretic; indapamide; clinical trials; equivalence study; long-term study;
D O I
10.1097/00004872-199816110-00015
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective In accordance with international recommendations on the need to decrease doses of antihypertensive drugs, a low-dose (1.5 mg) sustained-release (SR) formulation of indapamide was developed to optimize the drug's efficacy:safety ratio. The aim of this work was to evaluate the benefit of a tow-dose diuretic by consolidating the efficacy and safety results of two clinical trials with a similar design. Patients and methods Clinical data were obtained in two European randomized double-blind studies with 690 mild to moderate hypertensive patients (95 mmHg less than or equal to supine diastolic blood pressure less than or equal to 114 mmHg using a mercury sphygmomanometer) treated respectively for 2 and 3 months, with a mean age of 53 and 57 years, 44 and 57% males, mean supine diastolic blood pressure of 100.6 and 102.5 mmHg and mean supine systolic blood pressure of 161.0 and 164.5 mmHg. Results The first study, a dose-finding study with indapamide SR at 1.5, 2 and 2.5 mg versus placebo and the immediate-release (IR) formulation of indapamide, showed that the 1.5 mg dosage of the new indapamide formulation had an improved antihypertensive efficacy:safety ratio. The second study confirmed the equivalence of blood pressure reductions with 1.5 mg indapamide SR and 2.5 mg indapamide IR, and better acceptability with 1.5 mg indapamide SR, particularly in the number of patients with serum potassium levels < 3.4 mmol/l, which was reduced by more than 50%. The long-term efficacy of 1.5 mg indapamide SR was observed through a 9-month open-treatment follow-up to the second study. Conclusion The 1.5 mg SR formulation of indapamide has an improved antihypertensive efficacy:safety ratio, which is in accordance with international recommendations for the use of low-dose antihypertensive drugs and diuretics in first-line therapy of hypertension. J Hypertens 1998, 16:1677-1684 (C) Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:1677 / 1684
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] A comparison of blood lipid and blood pressure responses during the treatment of systemic hypertension with indapamide and with thiazides
    Ames, RP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 77 (06) : B12 - B16
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1991, JAMA, V265, P3255
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1997, ARCH INTERN MED, V157, P2413, DOI [10.1001/archinte.1997.00440420033005, DOI 10.1001/ARCHINTE.1997.00440420033005]
  • [4] BRUNNER HR, 1990, J HYPERTENS, V8, P3, DOI 10.1097/00004872-199001000-00002
  • [5] CAPONE P, 1983, CLIN THER, V5, P305
  • [6] Effect of indapamide on left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension: A meta-analysis
    Carey, PA
    Sheridan, DJ
    deCordoue, A
    Guez, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 77 (06) : B17 - B19
  • [7] CHAFFMAN M, 1988, DRUGS, V28, P121
  • [8] CHALMERS J, 1990, J HYPERTENS, V8, pS27
  • [9] BLOOD-PRESSURE, STROKE, AND CORONARY HEART-DISEASE .2. SHORT-TERM REDUCTIONS IN BLOOD-PRESSURE - OVERVIEW OF RANDOMIZED DRUG TRIALS IN THEIR EPIDEMIOLOGIC CONTEXT
    COLLINS, R
    PETO, R
    MACMAHON, S
    HEBERT, P
    FIEBACH, NH
    EBERLEIN, KA
    GODWIN, J
    QIZILBASH, N
    TAYLOR, JO
    HENNEKENS, CH
    [J]. LANCET, 1990, 335 (8693) : 827 - 838
  • [10] ANTIHYPERTENSIVE EFFECT OF INDAPAMIDE IN LOW-DOSES
    FERNANDES, M
    MARTINEZ, E
    FIORENTINI, R
    MAZZELLA, J
    AFFRIME, M
    CHANDLER, T
    BUSBY, P
    KIM, KE
    LOWENTHAL, DT
    SWARTZ, C
    ONESTI, G
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 1977, 5 : 60 - 63