Strong antiapostatic selection against novel rare aposematic prey

被引:128
作者
Lindström, L [1 ]
Alatalo, RV [1 ]
Lyytinen, A [1 ]
Mappes, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Biol & Environm Sci, FIN-40351 Jyvaskyla, Finland
关键词
D O I
10.1073/pnas.161071598
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The evolution of aposematism, a phenomenon where prey species conspicuously advertise their unprofitability to predators, is puzzling. How did conspicuousness evolve, if it simultaneously increased the likelihood of an inexperienced predator to detect the prey and presumably kill it? Antiapostatic selection, where rare prey is predated relatively more often, is considered as another major difficulty for aposematism to evolve. However, the risk of being conspicuous in low frequencies has not been experimentally tested. We designed an experiment to test how frequency (4%, 12%, 32%) of conspicuous aposematic prey and its dispersion type (solitary vs. aggregated) affect an initial predation risk of the prey and in avoidance learning of predators. Wild great tits (Parus major) were predators on artificial prey in a "novel world." The relative mortality of aposematic prey was antiapostatic, thus the frequency-dependent predation was most severe at low frequencies. In all frequencies, aggregated aposematic prey survived better than solitary prey. Surprisingly, learning was not determined by a fixed number of unpalatable prey eaten, but at low frequencies fewer aposematic individuals eaten generated predators' avoidance learning. However, per-capita risk for the prey remained highest at low frequencies. Our results underscore the problems of initial evolution of rare conspicuous morphs. Aggregated prey suffered less from predation, indicating selective advantage of aggregation over solitary living for a conspicuous individual.
引用
收藏
页码:9181 / 9184
页数:4
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Tracking the evolution of warning signals [J].
Alatalo, RV ;
Mappes, J .
NATURE, 1996, 382 (6593) :708-710
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Biostatistical analysis
[4]   Does prey dispersion affect frequency-dependent predation by wild birds? [J].
Church, SC ;
Jowers, M ;
Allen, JA .
OECOLOGIA, 1997, 111 (02) :292-296
[5]  
Cott H. B., 1940, ADAPTIVE COLORATION
[6]  
Edmunds M., 1974, DEFENSE ANIMALS SURV
[8]  
ENDLER JA, 1993, BEHAV ECOLOGY EVOLUT, P169
[9]  
Fisher R. A., 1999, The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection: A Complete Variorum Edition
[10]   WHY DO WARNING-COLORED PREY LIVE GREGARIOUSLY [J].
GAGLIARDO, A ;
GUILFORD, T .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1993, 251 (1330) :69-74