Improving prevention in primary care: evaluating the effectiveness of outreach facilitation

被引:35
作者
Hogg, W. [1 ,2 ]
Lemelin, J. [1 ]
Graham, I. D. [3 ,5 ]
Grimshaw, J. [3 ,4 ]
Martin, C. [6 ]
Moore, L. [1 ]
Soto, E. [2 ]
O'Rourke, K. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Dept Family Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, CT Lamount Primary Hlth Care Res Ctr, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa Hlth Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, Dept Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Ottawa, Dept Nursing, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Ottawa, No Ontario Sch Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Ottawa, Dept Epidemiol & Community Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
cluster-randomized controlled trials; family physicians; outreach facilitation; preventive care;
D O I
10.1093/fampra/cmm070
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. Out reach facilitation is designed to promote uptake of evidence-based guidelines. There is evidence indicating that outreach facilitation can be effective in improving implementation of preventive care in GPs' offices. In this trial, we test a modified version of an outreach facilitation intervention. Objective. To evaluate whether a comprehensive preventive intervention program using outreach facilitators improves preventive care delivery. Design. Match-paired, cluster-randomized controlled trial. Setting. Fee-for-service primary care practices in Eastern Ontario, Canada, at a time of physician shortage. Participants. Volunteer sample of 54 primary care practices. Main outcome measures. Mean difference between trial arms in practices' delivery of preventive manoeuvres, measured by preventive performance indices estimated from chart reviews and patient survey data. Results. No difference was detected between the trial's arms for the primary outcome's overall prevention index [2.0%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.2 to 7.3; P = 0.44]. A small significant difference between the arms was detected for the secondary outcome's overall prevention index (2.8%; 95% CI 0.7-4.8; P = 0.01). Conclusion. In contrast to similar facilitation trials, this outreach facilitation program did not produce improvements in the delivery of preventive care. This lack of effect may be due to differences in the intervention and context, or the practice's limited capacity to change. Our intervention simultaneously facilitated a high number of manoeuvres, blinded facilitators and physicians to the targeted tests and had a relatively short intervention period and large number of practices assigned per facilitator. Changes in the primary care service model in Ontario at the time of the trial could have also washed out the intervention effect.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 48
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
ABELSON J, 1990, CAN MED ASSOC J, V142, P575
[2]  
ABRAMS D, 1997, HLTH BEHAV HLTH ED P
[3]  
AWDE C, 1981, CANADIAN FAMILY MED
[4]  
Baskerville N B, 2001, J Fam Pract, V50, pW241
[5]  
BELCHER D W, 1988, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, V4, P27
[6]  
BURACK RC, 1989, PRIMARY CARE, V16, P245
[7]   Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framewouk for improvement [J].
Cabana, MD ;
Rand, CS ;
Powe, NR ;
Wu, AW ;
Wilson, MH ;
Abboud, PAC ;
Rubin, HR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (15) :1458-1465
[8]  
*CAN TASK FORC PRE, EV BAS CLIN PREV
[9]  
Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2003, HLTH CAR CAN
[10]  
*COLL FAM PHYS CAN, 2001, NAT FAM PHYS WORKF S