Flow injection determination of selenium by successive retention of Se(IV) and tetrahydroborate(III) on an anion-exchange resin and hydride generation electrothermal atomization atomic absorption spectrometry with in-atomizer trapping - Part 1. Method development and investigation of interferences

被引:20
作者
Carrero, PE [1 ]
Tyson, JF [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Chem, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
关键词
selenium; in-atomizer hydride trapping; ion-exchange preconcentration; solid phase hydride generation; electrothermal atomization; flow injection;
D O I
10.1016/S0584-8547(98)00243-2
中图分类号
O433 [光谱学];
学科分类号
0703 ; 070302 ;
摘要
A sample solution was passed at 20 mi min(-1) through a column (150 x 4 mm(2)) of Amberlite IRA-410Stron anion-exchange resin for 60 s. After washing, a solution of 0.1% sodium borohydride was passed through the column for 60 s at 5.1 mi min(-1) Following a second wash, a solution of 8 mol l(-1) hydrochloric acid was passed at 5.1 mi min(-1) for 45 s. The hydrogen selenide was stripped from the eluent solution by the addition of an argon flow at 150 mi min(-1) and the bulk phases were separated by a glass gas-liquid separator containing glass beads. The gas stream was dried by passing through a Nafion(R) dryer and fed, via a quartz capillary tube, into the dosing hole of a transversely heated graphite cuvette containing an integrated L'vov platform which had been pretreated with 120 mu g of iridium as trapping agent. The furnace was held at a temperature of 250 degrees C during this trapping stage and then stepped to 2000 degrees C for atomization. The calibration was performed with aqueous standards solution of selenium (selenite, SeO32-) with quantification by peak area. A number of experimental parameters, including reagent flow rates and composition., nature of the gas-liquid separator, nature of the anion-exchange resin, column dimensions, argon flow rate and sample pH, were optimized. The effects of a number of possible interferents, both anionic and cationic were studies for a solution of 500 ng l(-1) of selenium. The most severe depressions were caused by iron (III) and mercury (II) for which concentrations of 20 and 10 mg l(-1) caused a 5% depression on the selenium signal. For the other cations (cadmium, cobalt, copper, lead,. magnesium, and nickel) concentrations of 50-70 mg l(-1) could be tolerated. Arsenate interfered at a concentration of 3 mg(-1), whereas concentrations of chloride, bromide, iodide, perchlorate, and sulfate of 500-900 mg l(-1) could be tolerated. A linear response was obtained between the detection limit of 4 ng l(-1), with a characteristic mass of 130 pg. The RSDs for solutions containing 100 and 200 ng l(-1) selenium were 2.3% and 1.5%, respectively. (C) 1998 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:1931 / 1943
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   FLOW-INJECTION HYDRIDE GENERATION DETERMINATION OF ARSENIC WITH INSITU CONCENTRATION IN A GRAPHITE-FURNACE [J].
AN, Y ;
WILLIE, SN ;
STURGEON, RE .
SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART B-ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY, 1992, 47 (12) :1403-1410
[2]  
*BOD PERK ELM, 1993, PUBLICATION BOD PERK
[3]  
BRAJTER K, 1988, ANAL LETT, V21, P311
[4]  
BRAJTER K, 1989, MIKROCHIM ACTA, V1, P137
[5]   FLOW-INJECTION ELECTROTHERMAL ATOMIC-ABSORPTION SPECTROMETRY FOR ARSENIC SPECIATION USING THE FLEITMANN REACTION [J].
BURGUERA, M ;
BURGUERA, JL .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY, 1993, 8 (02) :229-233
[6]   Determination of selenium by atomic absorption spectrometry with simultaneous retention of selenium(IV) and tetrahydroborate(III) on an anion-exchange resin followed by flow injection hydride generation from the solid phase [J].
Carrero, PE ;
Tyson, JF .
ANALYST, 1997, 122 (09) :915-919
[7]  
CARRERO PE, UNPUB SPECTROCHIM B
[8]  
DEDINA J, 1995, HYDRIDE GENERATION A
[9]  
DULIVO A, 1991, J ANAL ATOM SPECTROM, V6, P566
[10]   COMPARISON OF ALTERNATING VARIABLE SEARCH AND SIMPLEX METHODS OF OPTIMIZATION FOR INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA OPTICAL-EMISSION AND ATOMIC FLUORESCENCE SPECTROMETRY [J].
GREENFIELD, S ;
SALMAN, MS ;
THOMSEN, M ;
TYSON, JF .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY, 1989, 4 (01) :55-65