Laguerre-Gauss basis functions in observer models

被引:4
作者
Burgess, AE [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2003: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT | 2003年 / 5034卷
关键词
basis functions; observer models; power-law noise; mammography; signal detection;
D O I
10.1117/12.479975
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Observer models based on linear classifiers with basis functions (channels) are useful for evaluation of detection performance with medical images. They allow spatial domain calculations with a covariance. matrix of tractable size. The term "channelized Fisher-Hotelling observer" will be used here. It is also called the "channelized Hotelling observer" model. There are an infinite number of basis function (channel) sets that could be employed. Examples of channel sets that have been used include: difference of Gaussian (DOG) filters, difference of Mesa (DOM) filters and Laguerre-Gauss (LG) basis functions. Another option, sums of LG functions (LGS), will also be presented here. This set has the advantage of having no DC response. The effect of the number of images used to estimate model observer performance will be described, for both filtered l/f(3) noise and GE digital mammogram backgrounds. Finite sample image sets introduce both bias-and variance to the estimate. The results presented here agree with previous work on linear classifiers. The LGS basis set gives a small but statistically significant reduction in bias. However, this may not be of much practical benefit. Finally, the effect of varying the number of basis functions included in the set will be addressed. It was found that four LG bases or three LGS bases are adequate.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 152
页数:9
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Abbey CK., 1998, ASSESSMENT RECONSTRU
[2]   Stabilized estimates of Hotelling-observer detection performance in patient-structured noise [J].
Barrett, HH ;
Abbey, CK ;
Gallas, B ;
Eckstein, M .
IMAGE PERCEPTION: MEDICAL IMAGING 1998, 1998, 3340 :27-43
[3]   Visual signal detectability with two noise components: Anomalous masking effects [J].
Burgess, AE ;
Li, X ;
Abbey, CK .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1997, 14 (09) :2420-2442
[4]   Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise [J].
Burgess, AE ;
Jacobson, FL ;
Judy, PF .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (04) :419-437
[5]   Classifier design for computer-aided diagnosis: Effects of finite sample size on the mean performance of classical and neural network classifiers [J].
Chan, HP ;
Sahiner, B ;
Wagner, RF ;
Petrick, N .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (12) :2654-2668
[6]  
Fukunaga K., 1972, Introduction to statistical pattern recognition
[7]  
Graham N. V. S., 1989, VISUAL PATTERN ANAL
[8]  
IRVING J, 1959, MATH PHYSICS ENG
[9]   ADDITION OF A CHANNEL MECHANISM TO THE IDEAL-OBSERVER MODEL [J].
MYERS, KJ ;
BARRETT, HH .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1987, 4 (12) :2447-2457
[10]  
Paul W, 1999, STOCHASTIC PROCESSES