The EXCITE Stroke Trial Comparing Early and Delayed Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy

被引:156
作者
Wolf, Steven L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Thompson, Paul A. [4 ]
Winstein, Carolee J. [6 ]
Miller, J. Phillip [5 ]
Blanton, Sarah R.
Nichols-Larsen, Deborah S. [7 ]
Morris, David M. [8 ]
Uswatte, Gitendra [9 ]
Taub, Edward [9 ]
Light, Kathye E. [10 ]
Sawaki, Lumy [11 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Rehabil Med, Dept Rehabil Med, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Cell Biol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Sanford Res Univ S Dakota, Methodol & Data Anal Ctr, Vermillion, SD USA
[5] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Biostat, St Louis, MO USA
[6] Univ So Calif, Sch Dent, Div Biokinesiol & Phys Therapy, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[7] Ohio State Univ, Sch Allied Med Profess, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[8] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Phys Therapy, Birmingham, AL USA
[9] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Psychol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[10] Univ Florida, Dept Phys Therapy, Gainesville, FL USA
[11] Univ Kentucky, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Lexington, KY USA
关键词
constraint-induced movement therapy; forced use; rehabilitation; stroke; upper extremity; UPPER EXTREMITY FUNCTION; UPPER-LIMB FUNCTION; MOTOR CORTEX; BRAIN; SURVIVORS; SCALE;
D O I
10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.588723
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose-Although constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) has been shown to improve upper extremity function in stroke survivors at both early and late stages after stroke, the comparison between participants within the same cohort but receiving the intervention at different time points has not been undertaken. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare functional improvements between stroke participants randomized to receive this intervention within 3 to 9 months (early group) to participants randomized on recruitment to receive the identical intervention 15 to 21 months after stroke (delayed group). Methods-Two weeks of CIMT was delivered to participants immediately after randomization (early group) or 1 year later (delayed group). Evaluators blinded to group designation administered primary (Wolf Motor Function Test, Motor Activity Log) and secondary (Stroke Impact Scale) outcome measures among the 106 early participants and 86 delayed participants before delivery of CIMT, 2 weeks thereafter, and 4, 8, and 12 months later. Results-Although both groups showed significant improvements from pretreatment to 12 months after treatment, the earlier CIMT group showed greater improvement than the delayed CIMT group in Wolf Motor Function Test Performance Time and the Motor Activity Log (P<0.0001), as well as in Stroke Impact Scale Hand and Activities domains (P<0.0009 and 0.0214, respectively). Early and delayed group comparison of scores on these measures 24 months after enrollment showed no statistically significant differences between groups. Conclusions-CIMT can be delivered to eligible patients 3 to 9 months or 15 to 21 months after stroke. Both patient groups achieved approximately the same level of significant arm motor function 24 months after enrollment. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00057018. (Stroke. 2010;41:2309-2315.)
引用
收藏
页码:2309 / 2315
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Behavioral and neurophysiological effects of delayed training following a small ischemic infarct in primary motor cortex of squirrel monkeys [J].
Barbay, S ;
Plautz, EJ ;
Friel, KM ;
Frost, SB ;
Dancause, N ;
Stowe, AM ;
Nudo, RJ .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 169 (01) :106-116
[2]   Efficacy of rehabilitative experience declines with time after focal ischemic brain injury [J].
Biernaskie, J ;
Chernenko, G ;
Corbett, D .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 24 (05) :1245-1254
[3]   Confounders in rehabilitation trials of task-oriented training: Lessons from the designs of the EXCITE and SCILT multicenter trials [J].
Dobkin, Bruce H. .
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2007, 21 (01) :3-13
[4]   Motor cortex activation during treatment may predict therapeutic gains in paretic hand function after stroke [J].
Dong, Yun ;
Dobkin, Bruce H. ;
Cen, Steven Y. ;
Wu, Allan D. ;
Winstein, Carolee J. .
STROKE, 2006, 37 (06) :1552-1555
[5]   Very Early Constraint-Induced Movement during Stroke Rehabilitation (VECTORS) A single-center RCT [J].
Dromerick, A. W. ;
Lang, C. E. ;
Birkenmeier, R. L. ;
Wagner, J. M. ;
Miller, J. P. ;
Videen, T. O. ;
Powers, W. J. ;
Wolf, S. L. ;
Edwards, D. F. .
NEUROLOGY, 2009, 73 (03) :195-201
[6]   Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The Stroke Impact Scale [J].
Duncan, PW ;
Bode, RK ;
Lai, SM ;
Perera, S .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2003, 84 (07) :950-963
[7]   The stroke impact scale version 2.0 - Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change [J].
Duncan, PW ;
Wallace, D ;
Lai, SM ;
Johnson, D ;
Embretson, S ;
Laster, LJ .
STROKE, 1999, 30 (10) :2131-2140
[8]  
FUGLMEYER AR, 1975, SCAND J REHABIL MED, V7, P13
[9]   Remodeling the brain - Plastic structural brain changes produced by different motor therapies after stroke [J].
Gauthier, Lynne V. ;
Taub, Edward ;
Perkins, Christi ;
Ortmann, Magdalene ;
Mark, Victor W. ;
Uswatte, Gitendra .
STROKE, 2008, 39 (05) :1520-1525
[10]  
Hardin James W, 2012, Generalized estimating equations