A comparison of the costs and survival of hospital-admitted stroke patients across Europe

被引:90
作者
Grieve, R
Hutton, J
Bhalla, A
Rastenytë, D
Ryglewicz, D
Sarti, C
Lamassa, M
Giroud, M
Dundas, R
Wolfe, CDA
机构
[1] GKT Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, London, England
[2] Kaunas Med Acad, Inst Cardiol, Kaunas, Lithuania
[3] Inst Psychiat & Neurol, Warsaw, Poland
[4] Natl Publ Hlth Inst, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Careggi Univ, Dept Neurol & Psychiat, Florence, Italy
[6] Univ Hosp Dijon, Dept Neurol, Dijon, France
关键词
costs and cost analysis; stroke management; survival;
D O I
10.1161/01.STR.32.7.1684
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose-Policy makers require evidence on the costs and outcomes of different ways of organizing stroke care, This study compared the costs and survival of different ways of providing stroke care. Methods Hospitalized stroke patients from 13 European centers were included, with demographic, case-mix, and resource use variables measured for each patient. Unit casts were collected and converted into US dollars using the purchasing power parity (PPP) index. Cox and linear regression analyses were used to compare survival and costs between the centers adjusting for case mix. Results - A total of 1847 patients were included in the study. After case-mix adjustment, the mean predicted costs ranged from $466 [95% CI 181 to 751] in Riga (Latvia) to $8512 [7696 to 9328] in Copenhagen (Denmark), which reflected differences in unit costs, and resource use. The mean length of hospitalization ranged from 8.3 days in Menorca (Spain) to 36.8 days in Turku B (Finland). In the 3 Finnish centers at least 80% of patients were admitted to: wards providing organized stroke care, which was not provided at the centers in Almada (Portugal), Menorca, or Riga. Patients m Turku A and Turku B were less likely to die:than those in Riga, Warsaw (Poland), or Menorca. The adjusted hazard ratios were 0.18 [0.10 to 0.32] for Turku A, 0.18 [0.10 to 0.32] for Turku B, 0.68 [0.48 to 0.96] for Warsaw, and 0.56;[0.33 to 0.96] for Menorca, all compared with Riga. Conclusions The cost of stroke care varies across Europe because of differences in unit costs, and resource use. Further research is needed to assess which ways of organizing stroke care are the most cost-effective.
引用
收藏
页码:1684 / 1691
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]
[Anonymous], STROKE EPIDEMIOLOGY
[2]
Asplund K, 1997, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V314, P1151
[3]
CLASSIFICATION AND NATURAL-HISTORY OF CLINICALLY IDENTIFIABLE SUBTYPES OF CEREBRAL INFARCTION [J].
BAMFORD, J ;
SANDERCOCK, P ;
DENNIS, M ;
BURN, J ;
WARLOW, C .
LANCET, 1991, 337 (8756) :1521-1526
[4]
Hospital services for stroke care - A European perspective [J].
Beech, R ;
Ratcliffe, M ;
Tilling, K ;
Wolfe, C .
STROKE, 1996, 27 (11) :1958-1964
[5]
Effect of correcting outcome data for case mix: An example from stroke medicine [J].
Davenport, RJ ;
Dennis, MS ;
Warlow, CP .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 312 (7045) :1503-1505
[6]
CURRENT STATUS OF ECONOMIC APPRAISAL OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY IN THE EUROPEAN-COMMUNITY - REPORT OF THE NETWORK [J].
DAVIES, L ;
COYLE, D ;
DRUMMOND, M .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1994, 38 (12) :1601-1607
[7]
Drummond M., 2015, METHODS EC EVALUATIO, V4
[8]
Ebrahim S., 1999, STROKE CARE MATTER C
[9]
A comparison of the cost-effectiveness of stroke care provided in London and Copenhagen [J].
Grieve, R ;
Porsdal, V ;
Hutton, J ;
Wolfe, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2000, 16 (02) :684-695
[10]
The development and use of a method to compare the costs of acute stroke across Europe [J].
Grieve, R ;
Dundas, R ;
Beech, R ;
Wolfe, C .
AGE AND AGEING, 2001, 30 (01) :67-72