Identifying scale-specific controls of soil organic matter distribution in mountain areas using anisotropy analysis and discrete wavelet transform

被引:15
作者
Guo, Yadong [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Ruiying [3 ]
Zeng, Yongnian [1 ]
Shi, Zhou [3 ]
Zhou, Qing [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent S Univ, Coll Geosci & Informat Phys, Changsha 410083, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm, Changsha 410128, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Environm & Resource Sci, Inst Agr Remote Sensing & Informat Technol Applic, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Mountainous area; Soil organic matter; Anisotropy; Scale effect; Discrete wavelet transform; SPATIAL VARIABILITY; CARBON; VARIABLES; TEMPERATURE; PREDICTION; STOCKS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.catena.2017.08.016
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
070403 [天体物理学];
摘要
Soil organic matter (SOM) is an important index to evaluate soil fertility. Knowing the spatial distribution of SOM and its controlling factors at different scales is basic to sustainable farmland management. The variability was explored mostly in plain farmlands or at small scales in previous studies. In the present study, combined with anisotropy analysis (AA) and discrete wavelet transform (DWT), we examined the spatial variability of SOM and its controlling factors at various scales in a mountainous area. Transect with dominant directions (major axis and minor axis) of SOM variability was extracted using AA and then the scale-specific variability was examined using DWT. Dominant factors of SOM variability at different scales were identified using correlation coefficients between SOM at different scales and various soil environmental factors. The results showed that the major axis along which SOM varied the most was 24 south by west, consistent with the strike of Wuling Mountains. The minor axis was perpendicular to the major axis direction. DWT separated the SOM variations into nine scale components (eight details, D1 through D8, and one approximation, A8) along the major axis and into eight scale components (seven details, Dl through D7, and one approximation, A7) along minor axis. The largest-scale component (A8 in major axis and A7 in minor axis) explained the most variance of SOM along both axes, accounting for half of the total variance. Compared with the original SOM before separation of scale components (undecomposed SOM), the scale components showed significant correlation with environmental factors. Both elevation and mean annual precipitation had positive correlation with SOM at large scales. However, there was a negative correlation between SOM and mean annual temperature. This indicates that the topography and local climate may have a stronger influence in controlling SOM spatial distribution in mountain regions. The relationship provides important information on environmental covariate selection in mapping soil resource. The combination of AA and DWT shows promise quantifying SOM spatial distribution and its control factors at different scales in mountainous areas.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]
Bao S. D., 2013, SOIL AGR CHEM ANAL, P30
[2]
Curve let transform to study scale-dependent anisotropic soil spatial variation [J].
Biswas, Asim ;
Cresswell, Hamish P. ;
Rossel, Raphael A. Viscarra ;
Si, Bing C. .
GEODERMA, 2014, 213 :589-599
[3]
Separating scale-specific soil spatial variability: A comparison of multi-resolution analysis and empirical mode decomposition [J].
Biswas, Asim ;
Cresswell, Hamish P. ;
Chau, Henry W. ;
Rossel, Raphael A. Viscarra ;
Si, Bing C. .
GEODERMA, 2013, 209 :57-64
[4]
Geostatistical analysis of soil properties of mid-west Taiwan soils [J].
Chien, YJ ;
Lee, DY ;
Guo, HY ;
Houng, KH .
SOIL SCIENCE, 1997, 162 (04) :291-298
[5]
Temperature and soil organic matter decomposition rates - synthesis of current knowledge and a way forward [J].
Conant, Richard T. ;
Ryan, Michael G. ;
Agren, Goran I. ;
Birge, Hannah E. ;
Davidson, Eric A. ;
Eliasson, Peter E. ;
Evans, Sarah E. ;
Frey, Serita D. ;
Giardina, Christian P. ;
Hopkins, Francesca M. ;
Hyvonen, Riitta ;
Kirschbaum, Miko U. F. ;
Lavallee, Jocelyn M. ;
Leifeld, Jens ;
Parton, William J. ;
Steinweg, Jessica Megan ;
Wallenstein, Matthew D. ;
Wetterstedt, J. A. Martin ;
Bradford, Mark A. .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2011, 17 (11) :3392-3404
[6]
Scale-dependent relationships between soil organic carbon and urease activity [J].
Corstanje, R. ;
Schulin, R. ;
Lark, R. M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2007, 58 (05) :1087-1095
[7]
Spatial prediction of soil organic matter content integrating artificial neural network and ordinary kriging in Tibetan Plateau [J].
Dai, Fuqiang ;
Zhou, Qigang ;
Lv, Zhiqiang ;
Wang, Xuemei ;
Liu, Gangcai .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 45 :184-194
[8]
Soil carbon stocks vary predictably with altitude in tropical forests: Implications for soil carbon storage [J].
Dieleman, Wouter I. J. ;
Venter, Michelle ;
Ramachandra, Anurag ;
Krockenberger, Andrew K. ;
Bird, Michael I. .
GEODERMA, 2013, 204 :59-67
[9]
*ESRI, 2014, ARCGIS HELP 10 2 10
[10]
Geostatistical tools for characterizing the spatial variability of microbiological and physico-chemical soil properties [J].
Goovaerts, P .
BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 1998, 27 (04) :315-334