Relationship between measures of dementia severity and observation of daily life functioning as measured with the assessment of motor and process skills (AMPS)

被引:27
作者
Bouwens, Sharon F. M.
van Heugten, Caroline M.
Aalten, Pauline
Wolfs, Claire A. G.
Baarends, Erica M.
van Menxel, Debby A. J.
Verhey, Frans R. J.
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Alzheimer Ctr Limburg, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Hosp, Dept Occupat Theraphy, azM, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Ctr Excellence Rehabil Med, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Zuyd Univ, Dept Occupat Theraphy, Heerlen, Netherlands
关键词
dementia severity measures; observation; assessment of motor and process skills; daily activities;
D O I
10.1159/000111694
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background: Cognitive impairment is mostly regarded as the core symptom of dementia, but several other domains (such as daily functioning) are equally relevant to assess the severity of dementia. The relationship between these domains is unclear. The Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) is a relatively unexplored instrument in people with dementia, measuring severity by direct observation. Objective: To study the relationship between the AMPS and scores on several commonly used outcome measures for the assessment of dementia severity, and to examine the possible influence of neuropsychiatric symptoms on these relationships in patients with cognitive disorders. Methods: Crosssectional data of 118 patients with cognitive disorders were used; data on cognition (Mini- Mental State Examination, MMSE; CAMCOG), global severity (Global Deterioration Scale, GDS), daily life functioning (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, IADL), and neuropsychiatric symptoms (Neuropsychiatric Inventory, NPI) were collected and analyzed using correlation and regression analyses. Different combinations of the severity measures were tested for their ability to predict the AMPS process ability scores. Results: Scores on the MMSE, CAMCOG and GDS were moderately associated with the AMPS process ability score. These measures explained between 27 and 44% of the variance in the AMPS score. The presence of apathy influenced the association between the cognitive measures and the AMPS score. Conclusion: Commonly used measures of dementia severity are only moderately associated with observation of performance on daily activities. This underlines the need for direct observation of daily activities in dementia patients. This relationship between several approaches of assessing dementia severity needs further study. Copyright (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 87
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 1995, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT
[2]  
[Anonymous], TIJDSCHRIFT PSYCHIAT
[3]   CLINICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE ASSESSMENT OF MOTOR AND PROCESS SKILLS OF PERSONS WITH PSYCHIATRIC-DISORDERS [J].
BARON, KB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 1994, 48 (09) :781-782
[4]   DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PERSONS WITH RIGHT OR LEFT CEREBRAL VASCULAR ACCIDENT ON THE ASSESSMENT OF MOTOR AND PROCESS SKILLS [J].
BERNSPANG, B ;
FISHER, AG .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1995, 76 (12) :1144-1151
[5]  
Bootes Kylie, 2002, Work, V19, P255
[6]   The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: A review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills [J].
Chaytor, N ;
Schmitter-Edgecombe, M .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2003, 13 (04) :181-197
[7]   The neuropsychiatric inventory: Assessing psychopathology in dementia patients [J].
Cummings, JL .
NEUROLOGY, 1997, 48 (05) :S10-S16
[8]   THE NEUROPSYCHIATRIC INVENTORY - COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY IN DEMENTIA [J].
CUMMINGS, JL ;
MEGA, M ;
GRAY, K ;
ROSENBERGTHOMPSON, S ;
CARUSI, DA ;
GORNBEIN, J .
NEUROLOGY, 1994, 44 (12) :2308-2314
[9]   Environment effect on functional task performance in adults with acquired brain injuries: Use of the assessment of motor and process skills [J].
Darragh, AR ;
Sample, PL ;
Fisher, AG .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1998, 79 (04) :418-423
[10]  
Doble S E, 1997, Int Psychogeriatr, V9, P25, DOI 10.1017/S1041610297004171