D1 but not D2 dopamine receptor antagonism blocks the acquisition of a flavor preference conditioned by intragastric carbohydrate infusions

被引:61
作者
Azzara, AV
Bodnar, RJ
Delamater, AR
Sclafani, A [1 ]
机构
[1] CUNY Brooklyn Coll, Dept Psychol, Expt Doctoral Subprogram, Brooklyn, NY 11210 USA
[2] CUNY Queens Coll, Dept Psychol, Neuropsychol Doctoral Subprogram, Queens, NY USA
关键词
conditioned flavor preference; acquisition; expression; intragastric sucrose; SCH23390; raclopride;
D O I
10.1016/S0091-3057(01)00484-1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The effects of dopamine D-1 (SCH23390) and D-2 (raclopride) receptor antagonists on the acquisition and expressions of flavor preferences conditioned by the postingestive actions of sucrose were investigated. Food-restricted rats were trained in one-bottle sessions to associate one flavored saccharin solution (CS+) with intragastric (ig) infusions of 16% sucrose, and another flavored saccharin solution (CS-) with water infusions. Flavor preferences were then measured in two-bottle tests. In Experiment 1A, rats that received the D-2 antagonist (raclopride, 200 nmol/kg; RAC group) throughout training consumed less CS+ and CS- than did saline-treated Control rats; a saline-treated Yoked group had its intake limited to that of the RAC group. All three groups displayed CS+ preferences during two-bottle tests when treated with saline or raclopride, except at doses that greatly suppressed intake. Experiment 1B obtained similar results with rats treated with 400 nmol/kg raclopride throughout training. In Experiment 2, rats that received the DI antagonist (SCH23390, 200 nmol/kg; SCH group) throughout training consumed less CS+ and CS- than did saline-treated Control rats; a saline-treated Yoked group had its intake limited to that of the SCH group. Unlike the Control and Yoked groups, the SCH group failed to prefer the CS+ to the CS- in two bottle tests. SCH23390 treatment during two-bottle testing did not block CS+ preference in the Control or Yoked groups, except at doses that greatly suppressed intake. We conclude that D-1, but not D-2, dopamine receptors are critically involved in the acquisition of a sucrose-conditioned flavor preference, and both receptor subtypes have a more limited role in the expression of this preference. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 720
页数:12
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Naltrexone fails to block the acquisition or expression of a flavor preference conditioned by intragastric carbohydrate infusions [J].
Azzara, AV ;
Bodnar, RJ ;
Delamater, AR ;
Sclafani, A .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 2000, 67 (03) :545-557
[2]   Dopamine D1-like receptors and reward-related incentive learning [J].
Beninger, RJ ;
Miller, R .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 1998, 22 (02) :335-345
[3]   What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? [J].
Berridge, KC ;
Robinson, TE .
BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS, 1998, 28 (03) :309-369
[4]   A lateral hypothalamic D1 dopaminergic mechanism in conditioned taste aversion [J].
Caulliez, R ;
Meile, MJ ;
Nicolaidis, S .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1996, 729 (02) :234-245
[5]  
DAVIS JD, 1975, PHYSL TECHNIQUES BEH, P163
[6]   IMMEDIATE AND DELAYED REINFORCERS FOR FLAVOR PREFERENCES IN RATS [J].
HOLMAN, EW .
LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 1975, 6 (01) :91-100
[7]   RACLOPRIDE REDUCES SUCROSE PREFERENCE IN RATS [J].
HSIAO, S ;
SMITH, GP .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1995, 50 (01) :121-125
[8]   The role of nucleus accumbens dopamine in motivated behavior: a unifying interpretation with special reference to reward-seeking [J].
Ikemoto, S ;
Panksepp, J .
BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS, 1999, 31 (01) :6-41
[9]   A CONDITIONED-STIMULUS DECREASES EXTRACELLULAR DOPAMINE IN THE NUCLEUS-ACCUMBENS AFTER THE DEVELOPMENT OF A LEARNED TASTE-AVERSION [J].
MARK, GP ;
BLANDER, DS ;
HOEBEL, BG .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1991, 551 (1-2) :308-310
[10]   AN APPETITIVELY CONDITIONED TASTE ELICITS A PREFERENTIAL INCREASE IN MESOLIMBIC DOPAMINE RELEASE [J].
MARK, GP ;
SMITH, SE ;
RADA, PV ;
HOEBEL, BG .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1994, 48 (03) :651-660