Analysis of conserved noncoding DNA in Drosophila reveals similar constraints in intergenic and intronic sequences

被引:139
作者
Bergman, CM [1 ]
Kreitman, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Ecol & Evolut, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1101/gr.178701
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Comparative genomic approaches to gene and cis-regulatory prediction are based on the principle that differential DNA sequence conservation reflects variation in functional constraint. Using this principle, we analyze noncoding sequence conservation in Drosophila for 40 loci with known or suspected cis-regulatory function encompassing > 100 kb of DNA. We estimate the fraction of noncoding DNA conserved in both intergenic and intronic regions and describe the length distribution of ungapped conserved noncoding blocks. Oil average, 22%-26% of noncoding sequences surveyed are conserved in Drosophila, with median block length similar to 19 bp. We show that point Substitution in conserved noncoding blocks exhibits transition bias as well as lineage effects in base composition, and Occurs more than all order of magnitude more frequently than insertion/deletion (indel) substitution. Overall, patterns of noncoding DNA structure and evolution differ remarkably little between intergenic and intronic conserved blocks, suggesting that the effects of transcription per se contribute minimally to the constraints operating on these Sequences. The results of this study have implications for the development of alignment and prediction algorithms specific to noncoding DNA, as well as for models of cis-regulatory DNA sequence evolution.
引用
收藏
页码:1335 / 1345
页数:11
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster
    Adams, MD
    Celniker, SE
    Holt, RA
    Evans, CA
    Gocayne, JD
    Amanatides, PG
    Scherer, SE
    Li, PW
    Hoskins, RA
    Galle, RF
    George, RA
    Lewis, SE
    Richards, S
    Ashburner, M
    Henderson, SN
    Sutton, GG
    Wortman, JR
    Yandell, MD
    Zhang, Q
    Chen, LX
    Brandon, RC
    Rogers, YHC
    Blazej, RG
    Champe, M
    Pfeiffer, BD
    Wan, KH
    Doyle, C
    Baxter, EG
    Helt, G
    Nelson, CR
    Miklos, GLG
    Abril, JF
    Agbayani, A
    An, HJ
    Andrews-Pfannkoch, C
    Baldwin, D
    Ballew, RM
    Basu, A
    Baxendale, J
    Bayraktaroglu, L
    Beasley, EM
    Beeson, KY
    Benos, PV
    Berman, BP
    Bhandari, D
    Bolshakov, S
    Borkova, D
    Botchan, MR
    Bouck, J
    Brokstein, P
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2000, 287 (5461) : 2185 - 2195
  • [2] Andolfatto P, 1999, GENETICS, V153, P1297
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1991, The Causes of Molecular Evolution
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1969, DISTRIBUTIONS STAT D
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1993, MAKING FLY GENETICS
  • [6] Arnone MI, 1997, DEVELOPMENT, V124, P1851
  • [7] Ashburner M., 1989, DROSOPHILA LAB MANUA
  • [8] Human and mouse gene structure: Comparative analysis and application to exon prediction
    Batzoglou, S
    Pachter, L
    Mesirov, JP
    Berger, B
    Lander, ES
    [J]. GENOME RESEARCH, 2000, 10 (07) : 950 - 958
  • [9] BLACKMAN RK, 1986, J MOL BIOL, V188, P499, DOI 10.1016/S0022-2836(86)80001-8
  • [10] Regulatory elements and expression profiles
    Bucher, P
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (03) : 400 - 407