Is isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy superior to conventional reconstruction in pancreaticoduodenectomy?

被引：32

作者：

Perwaiz, Azhar ^{[1
]}

Singhal, Dinesh ^{[1
]}

Singh, Amanjeet ^{[1
]}

Chaudhary, Adarsh ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Sir Ganga Ram Hosp, Dept Surg Gastroenterol, New Delhi 110060, India

来源：

HPB | 2009年 / 11卷 / 04期

关键词：

pancreaticoduodenectomy; pancreaticojejunostomy;

D O I：

10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00051.x

中图分类号：

R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Objectives: Pancreatic fistula (PF) predicts mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study aimed to assess whether isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy (IPJ) is superior to conventional pancreaticojejunostomy (CPJ). Methods: Between September 2003 and July 2007, we performed 108 PDs. All patients underwent classical Kausch-Whipple PD with pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ). Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of PJ. Patients in group 1 underwent IPJ and those in group 2 underwent CPJ. A retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained data was performed to compare outcomes in the two groups. Results: There were 53 patients in group 1 and 55 in group 2. The two groups were comparable in both pre- and intraoperative parameters. The overall incidence of PF was 10.1% (five cases in group 1 vs. six in group 2). The course of clinically significant PF was similar in both groups in terms of fistula behaviour, management and the duration of spontaneous closure. Two patients in each group died. Overall complications, mortality and length of hospital stay were also similar; however, duration of surgery was significantly higher in group 1 vs. group 2 (442 min and 370 min, respectively; P = 0.005). Conclusions: Isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy is not superior to conventional PJ; instead, it increases the duration of surgery.

引用

页码：326 / 331

页数：6

共 19 条

[1]

Miedema B.W., Sarr M.G., van Heerdeen J.A., Nagorney D.M., McIlrath D.C., Ilstrup D., Complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Current management, Arch Surg, 127, pp. 945-950, (1992)

[2]

Yeo C.J., Cameron J.L., Sohn T.A., Lillemoe K.D., Pitt H.A., Tralamini M.A., Et al., Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: Pathology, complications and outcomes, Ann Surg, 226, pp. 248-260, (1997)

[3]

Shrikhande S.V., Qureshi S.S., Rajneesh N., Shukla P.J., Pancreatic anastomoses after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Do we need further studies?, World J Surg, 29, pp. 1642-1649, (2005)

[4]

Bassi C., Butturini G., Molinari E., Mascetta G., Salvia R., Falconi M., Et al., Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions, Dig Surg, 21, pp. 54-59, (2004)

[5]

Bassi C., Dervenis C., Butturini G., Fingerhut A., Yeo C., Izbicki J., Et al., Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition, Surgery, 138, pp. 8-13, (2005)

[6]

Machado M.C., Monterio da Cunha J.E., Bachella T., Bove P., A modified technique for the reconstruction of the alimentary tract after pancreatoduodenectomy, Surg Gynecol Obstet, 143, pp. 271-273, (1976)

[7]

van Berge Henegouwen M.I., Van Gulik T.M., De Wit L.T., Allema J.H., Rauws E.A., Obertop H., Et al., Delayed gastric emptying after standard pancreaticoduodenectomy vs. pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: An analysis of 200 consecutive patients, J Am Coll Surg, 185, pp. 373-379, (1997)

[8]

Yang Y.M., Tian X.D., Zhuang Y., Wang W.M., Wan Y.L., Huang Y.T., Risk factors of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy, World J Gastroenterol, 11, pp. 2456-2461, (2005)

[9]

Cameron J.L., Riall T.S., Coleman J., Belcher K.A., One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies, Ann Surg, 244, pp. 10-15, (2006)

[10]

Pen S.Y., Wang J.W., Lau W.Y., Cai X.J., Mou Y.P., Liu Y.B., Et al., Conventional vs. binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A prospective randomized trial, Ann Surg, 245, pp. 692-698, (2007)

← 1 2 →