Effects of substrate modification on the interfacial adhesion of acrylic elastomers

被引:43
作者
Ahn, D
Shull, KR [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/la9713964
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Axisymmetric adhesion tests are used to probe the adhesion between a carboxylated, poly(n-butyl acrylate) (PNBA) elastomer and a variety of substrates. The elastomer is in the form of a hemispherical cap, which is pressed against a flat substrate to give a circular contact area. A standard fracture mechanics approach is used to relate the applied load and the radius of the contact area to the energy release rate, g which can be viewed as an adhesion energy. For a given substrate, g is a function of the crack velocity, v, defined as the time derivative of the contact radius. The contact pressure does not appear to play a role in the development of the adhesive forces, and the specific relationship between g and v depends on the substrate. In all cases this relationship can be adequately described by the empirical expression, g(v) = g(o)(l + (v/v*)(0.6)). Values of g(o) are within a factor of about 2 of the expected thermodynamic work of adhesion, but values of v* vary from 5.5 to 215 nm/s, depending on the detailed nature of the substrate. Decreases in the adhesion energy, as quantified by a decrease in g(o) and/or an increase in v* are determined primarily by the segmental mobility of the substrate molecules. Comparison of results for free and grafted PNBA chains indicates that translational diffusion of molecules at the substrate is not required in order to substantially reduce the adhesion energy.
引用
收藏
页码:3646 / 3654
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   JKR studies of acrylic elastomer adhesion to glassy polymer substrates [J].
Ahn, D ;
Shull, KR .
MACROMOLECULES, 1996, 29 (12) :4381-4390
[2]   Effects of methylation and neutralization of carboxylated poly(n-butyl acrylate) on the interfacial and bulk contributions to adhesion [J].
Ahn, D ;
Shull, KR .
LANGMUIR, 1998, 14 (13) :3637-3645
[3]   PEEL ADHESION BEHAVIOR OF CARBOXYLIC ELASTOMERS [J].
AUBREY, DW ;
GINOSATIS, S .
JOURNAL OF ADHESION, 1981, 12 (03) :189-198
[4]   TACKINESS OF ELASTOMERS [J].
BARQUINS, M ;
MAUGIS, D .
JOURNAL OF ADHESION, 1981, 13 (01) :53-65
[5]  
Brandup J., 1989, POLYM HDB
[6]   CHAIN PULLOUT AND MOBILITY EFFECTS IN FRICTION AND LUBRICATION [J].
BROWN, HR .
SCIENCE, 1994, 263 (5152) :1411-1413
[7]   EFFECTS OF CHAIN PULL-OUT ON ADHESION OF ELASTOMERS [J].
BROWN, HR .
MACROMOLECULES, 1993, 26 (07) :1666-1670
[8]   MATRIX-MODULATED SWELLING OF A POLYMER BRUSH [J].
BUDKOWSKI, A ;
STEINER, U ;
KLEIN, J ;
FETTERS, LJ .
EUROPHYSICS LETTERS, 1992, 20 (06) :499-504
[9]   ADHESION HYSTERESIS AND FRICTION [J].
CHAUDHURY, MK ;
OWEN, MJ .
LANGMUIR, 1993, 9 (01) :29-31
[10]   DIRECT MEASUREMENT OF INTERFACIAL INTERACTIONS BETWEEN SEMISPHERICAL LENSES AND FLAT SHEETS OF POLY(DIMETHYLSILOXANE) AND THEIR CHEMICAL DERIVATIVES [J].
CHAUDHURY, MK ;
WHITESIDES, GM .
LANGMUIR, 1991, 7 (05) :1013-1025