Conserving macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams: the importance of knowing the relative contributions of α and β diversity

被引:42
作者
Clarke, Amber [1 ,2 ]
Mac Nally, Ralph [1 ]
Bond, Nick R. [1 ,2 ]
Lake, P. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Biol Sci, Australian Ctr Biodivers, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, eWater Cooperat Res Ctr, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
关键词
Alpha diversity; beta diversity; diversity partitioning; headwater stream; irreplaceability; macroinvertebrates; MULTIPLE SPATIAL SCALES; SPECIES-DIVERSITY; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; GAMMA-DIVERSITY; ASH FOREST; LANDSCAPE; COMMUNITIES; RICHNESS; NETWORKS; IRREPLACEABILITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00692.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aim We investigated partitioning of aquatic macroinvertebrate diversity in eight headwater streams to determine the relative contributions of alpha and beta diversity to gamma diversity, and the scale dependence of alpha and beta components. Location Great Dividing Range, Victoria, Australia. Methods We used the method of Jost (Ecology, 2007, 88, 2427-2439) to partition gamma diversity into its alpha and beta components. We undertook the analyses at both reach and catchment scales to explore whether inferences depended on scale of observation. Results We hypothesized that beta diversity would make a large contribution to the gamma diversity of macroinvertebrates in our dendritic riverine landscape, particularly at the larger spatial scale (among catchments) because of limited dispersal among sites and especially among catchments. However, reaches each had relatively high taxon richness and high alpha diversity, while beta diversity made only a small contribution to gamma diversity at both the reach and catchment scales. Main conclusions Dendritic riverine landscapes have been thought to generate high beta diversity as a consequence of limited dispersal and high heterogeneity among individual streams, but this may not hold for all headwater stream systems. Here, alpha diversity was high and beta diversity low, with individual headwater stream reaches each containing a large portion of gamma diversity. Thus, each stream could be considered to have low irreplaceability since losing the option to use one of these sites in a representative reserve network does not greatly diminish the options available for completing the reserve network. Where limited information on individual taxonomic distributions is available, or time and money for modelling approaches are limited, diversity partitioning may provide a useful 'first-cut' for obtaining information about the irreplaceability of individual streams or subcatchments when establishing representative freshwater reserves.
引用
收藏
页码:725 / 736
页数:12
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Fractal river basins: Chance and self-organization
[2]   A successful community-level strategy for conservation prioritization [J].
Arponen, Anni ;
Moilanen, Atte ;
Ferrier, Simon .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2008, 45 (05) :1436-1445
[3]   The Big Ash Forest, Wallaby Creek, Victoria - changes during one lifetime [J].
Ashton, DH .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2000, 48 (01) :1-26
[4]   A SAMPLING DEVICE THAT QUANTITATIVELY COLLECTS BENTHOS IN FLOWING OR STANDING WATERS [J].
BOULTON, AJ .
HYDROBIOLOGIA, 1985, 127 (01) :31-39
[5]   Additive partitioning of diversity across hierarchical spatial scales in a forested landscape [J].
Chandy, Shibi ;
Gibson, David J. ;
Robertson, Philip A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2006, 43 (04) :792-801
[6]   Macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams: a review [J].
Clarke, Amber ;
Mac Nally, Ralph ;
Bond, Nick ;
Lake, P. S. .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (09) :1707-1721
[7]  
Cole MB, 2003, CAN J FOREST RES, V33, P1433, DOI [10.1139/x03-059, 10.1139/X03-059]
[8]   SPECIES INTERACTIONS, LOCAL AND REGIONAL PROCESSES, AND LIMITS TO THE RICHNESS OF ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES - A THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE [J].
CORNELL, HV ;
LAWTON, JH .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1992, 61 (01) :1-12
[9]   Additive partitioning of rarefaction curves and species-area relationships:: unifying α-, β- and γ-diversity with sample size and habitat area [J].
Crist, Thomas O. ;
Veech, Joseph A. .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2006, 9 (08) :923-932
[10]  
DOWNES BJ, 2008, P ROYAL ENT SOC 24 S, P184