Impact of vessel size on outcome after implantation of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents -: A subgroup analysis of the SIRTAX trial

被引:61
作者
Togni, Mario
Eber, Stephanie
Widmer, Jeannette
Billinger, Michael
Wenaweser, Peter
Cook, Stephane
Vogel, Rolf
Seiler, Christian
Eberli, Franz R.
Maier, Willibald
Corti, Roberto
Roffi, Marco
Luescher, Thomas F.
Garachemani, Ali
Hess, Otto M.
Wandel, Simon
Meier, Bernhard
Jueni, Peter
Windecker, Stephan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Bern, Dept Cardiol, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp Bern, Dept Social & Prevent Med, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Cardiol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.015
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives We assessed the impact of vessel size on angiographic and long-term clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) within a randomized trial (SIRTAX [Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Compared With Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for Coronary Revascularization]). Background Percutaneous coronary intervention in small-vessel disease is associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Methods A total of 1,012 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with SES (n = 503) or PES (n = 509). A stratified analysis of angiographic and clinical outcome was performed up to 2 years after PCI according to size of the treated vessel (reference vessel diameter <= 2.75 vs. > 2.75 mm). Results Of 1,012 patients, 370 patients (37%) with 495 lesions underwent stent implantation in small vessels only, 504 patients (50%) with 613 lesions in large vessels only, and 138 patients (14%) with 301 lesions in both small and large vessels (mixed). In patients with small-vessel stents, SES reduced MACE by 55% (10.4% vs. 21.4%; p = 0.004), mainly driven by a 69% reduction of target lesion revascularization (TLR) (6.0% vs. 17.7%; p = 0.001) compared with PES at 2 years. In patients with large- and mixed-vessel stents, rates of MACE (large: 10.4% vs. 13.1%; p = 0.33; mixed: 16.7% vs. 18.0%; p = 0.83) and TLR (large: 6.9% vs. 8.6%; p = 0.47; mixed: 16.7% vs. 15.4%; p = 0.86) were similar for SES and PES. There were no significant differences with respect to death and myocardial infarction between the 3 groups. Conclusions Compared with PES, SES more effectively reduced MACE and TLR in small-vessel disease. Differences between SES and PES appear less pronounced in patients with large- and mixed-vessel disease. (The SIRTAX trial; http:// clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00297661?order=1; NCT00297661).
引用
收藏
页码:1123 / 1131
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Is bare-metal stenting superior to balloon angioplasty for small vessel coronary artery disease? Evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized trials [J].
Agostoni, P ;
Biondi-Zoccai, GGL ;
Gasparini, GL ;
Anselmi, M ;
Morando, G ;
Turri, M ;
Abbate, A ;
McFadden, EP ;
Vassanelli, C ;
Zardini, P ;
Colombo, A ;
Serruys, PW .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (09) :881-889
[2]   Sirolimus-eluting vs uncoated stents for prevention of restenosis in small coronary arteries - A randomized trial [J].
Ardissino, D ;
Cavallini, C ;
Bramucci, E ;
Indolfi, C ;
Marzocchi, A ;
Manari, A ;
Angeloni, G ;
Carosio, G ;
Bonizzoni, E ;
Colusso, S ;
Repetto, M ;
Merlini, PA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (22) :2727-2734
[3]   Subgroup analyses in randomized trials: risks of subgroup-specific analyses; power and sample size for the interaction test [J].
Brookes, ST ;
Whitely, E ;
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Mulheran, PA ;
Peters, TJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 57 (03) :229-236
[4]  
de Lezo JS, 2005, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V45, p75A
[5]   Paclitaxel-eluting or sirolimus-eluting stents to prevent restenosis in diabetic patients [J].
Dibra, A ;
Kastrati, A ;
Mehilli, J ;
Pache, J ;
Schühlen, H ;
von Beckerath, N ;
Ulm, K ;
Wessely, R ;
Dirschinger, J ;
Schömig, A .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (07) :663-670
[6]   Vessel size and long-term outcome after coronary stent placement [J].
Elezi, S ;
Kastrati, A ;
Neumann, FJ ;
Hadamitzky, M ;
Dirschinger, J ;
Schömig, A .
CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (18) :1875-1880
[7]   Vessel size and outcome after coronary drug-eluting stent placement:: Results from a large cohort of patients treated with sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents [J].
Elezi, Shpend ;
Dibra, Alban ;
Mehilli, Julinda ;
Pache, Juergen ;
Wessely, Rainer ;
Schoemig, Albert ;
Kastrati, Adnan .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 48 (07) :1304-1309
[8]   Relationship between angiographic late loss and target lesion revascularization after coronary stent implantation - Analysis from the TAXUS-IV trial [J].
Ellis, SG ;
Popma, JJ ;
Lasala, JM ;
Koglin, JJ ;
Cox, DA ;
Hermiller, J ;
O'Shaughnessy, C ;
Mann, JT ;
Turco, M ;
Caputo, R ;
Bergin, P ;
Greenberg, J ;
Stone, GW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (08) :1193-1200
[9]   Outcomes with the polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent in patients with diabetes mellitus - The TAXUS-IV trial [J].
Hermiller, JB ;
Raizner, A ;
Cannon, L ;
Gurbel, PA ;
Kutcher, MA ;
Wong, SC ;
Russell, ME ;
Ellis, SG ;
Mehran, R ;
Stone, GW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (08) :1172-1179
[10]   Systematic reviews in health care -: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials [J].
Jüni, P ;
Altman, DG ;
Egger, M .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7303) :42-46