Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing THE INFLUENCE OF COMPONENT TYPE, ORIENTATION AND VOLUMETRIC WEAR

被引:316
作者
Langton, D. J. [1 ]
Joyce, T. J. [2 ]
Jameson, S. S. [1 ]
Lord, J. [2 ]
Van Orsouw, M. [3 ]
Holland, J. P. [4 ]
Nargol, A. V. F. [5 ]
De Smet, K. A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE15 8NY, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Newcastle Univ, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] ANCA Med Ctr, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[4] Freeman Rd Hosp, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE7 7DN, Tyne & Wear, England
[5] Univ Hosp N Tees, Stockton On Tees TS19 8PE, England
来源
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME | 2011年 / 93B卷 / 02期
关键词
ARTHROPLASTY; DIAMETER; FAILURE; MICROSEPARATION; LUBRICATION; REPLACEMENT; BEARINGS; JOINTS;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.25099
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
We sought to establish the incidence of joint failure secondary to adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in a large, three surgeon, multicentre study involving 4226 hips with a follow-up of 10 to 142 months. Three implants were studied: the Articular Surface Replacement; the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing; and the Conserve Plus. Retrieved implants underwent analysis using a co-ordinate measuring machine to determine volumetric wear. There were 58 failures associated with ARMD. The median chromium and cobalt concentrations in the failed group were significantly higher than in the control group (p < 0.001). Survival analysis showed a failure rate in the patients with Articular Surface Replacement of 9.8% at five years, compared with < 1% at five years for the Conserve Plus and 1.5% at ten years for the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing. Two ARMD patients had relatively low wear of the retrieved components. Increased wear from the metal-on-metal bearing surface was associated with an increased rate of failure secondary to ARMD. However, the extent of tissue destruction at revision surgery did not appear to be dose-related to the volumetric wear.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 171
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 6 NAT JOINT REG ENGL
[2]
Intraoperative pelvic motion in total hip arthroplasty [J].
Asayama, I ;
Akiyoshi, Y ;
Naito, M ;
Ezoe, M .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2004, 19 (08) :992-997
[3]
The rationale for tilt-adjusted acetabular cup navigation [J].
Babisch, Juergen W. ;
Layher, Frank ;
Amiot, Louis-Philippe .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A (02) :357-365
[4]
'Severe' wear challenge to 'as-cast' and 'double heat-treated' large-diameter metal-on-metal hip bearings [J].
Bowsher, JG ;
Nevelos, J ;
Williams, PA ;
Shelton, JC .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2006, 220 (H2) :135-143
[5]
Soluble and Particulate Co-Cr-Mo Alloy Implant Metals Activate the Inflammasome Danger Signaling Pathway in Human Macrophages: A Novel Mechanism for Implant Debris Reactivity [J].
Caicedo, Marco S. ;
Desai, Ronak ;
McAllister, Kyron ;
Reddy, Anand ;
Jacobs, Joshua J. ;
Hallab, Nadim J. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2009, 27 (07) :847-854
[6]
Counsell A, 2008, ACTA ORTHOP BELG, V74, P870
[7]
Ten-year results of a double-heat-treated metal-on-metal hip resurfacing [J].
Daniel, J. ;
Ziaee, H. ;
Kamali, A. ;
Pradhan, C. ;
Band, T. ;
McMinn, D. J. W. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2010, 92B (01) :20-27
[8]
Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip - The influence of malpositioning of the components [J].
De Haan, R. ;
Campbell, P. A. ;
Su, E. P. ;
De Smet, K. A. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2008, 90B (09) :1158-1163
[9]
Metal Ion Measurement as a Diagnostic Tool to Identify Problems with Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing [J].
de Smet, K. ;
de Haan, R. ;
Calistri, A. ;
Campbell, P. A. ;
Ebramzadeh, E. ;
Pattyn, C. ;
Gill, H. S. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A :202-208
[10]
Belgium experience with metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty [J].
De Smet, KA .
ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2005, 36 (02) :203-+