Economical and environmental factors in light alloys automotive applications

被引:77
作者
Caceres, Carlos H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Engn, CAST Cooperat Res Ctr, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Engn, ARC Ctr Excellence Design Light Met, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
来源
METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS A-PHYSICAL METALLURGY AND MATERIALS SCIENCE | 2007年 / 38A卷 / 07期
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s11661-007-9156-z
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The effects of mass reduction through substitution of ferrous components by equivalent Al or Mg alloy components on the vehicle's cost and CO2 emissions are discussed using M.F. Ashby's penalty functions and exchange constants method. The viability of substitutions of At alloys by Mg alloys is also considered. Substitutions of cast components at equal volume and panels and beams at constant stiffness are considered. Substitutions of cast ferrous components are economically the only viable ones in terms of the CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) liability, although the cost penalty can be fully offset by the gasoline savings over the life of the car for most other forms of light alloy substitutions. When primary alloys are used, the gasoline savings over the lifetime of a lighter car offset the CO2 footprint of Al alloys in all cases. Because of their larger CO2 footprint, the environmental feasibility is somewhat restricted for electrolytic Mg, and more so for Mg produced by the Pidgeon process. Due to their high recyclability, Al casting alloys have a significant environmental advantage over all other light alloy applications. Viable substitutions of existing Al components by Mg components are largely restricted to castings of electrolytic Mg.
引用
收藏
页码:1649 / 1662
页数:14
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Aghion E, 2004, MAGNESIUM TECHNOLOGY 2004, P167
[2]   Multi-objective optimization in material design and selection [J].
Ashby, MF .
ACTA MATERIALIA, 2000, 48 (01) :359-369
[3]   RECYCLING OF METALS .2. NON-FERROUS-METALS [J].
BEVER, MB .
CONSERVATION & RECYCLING, 1976, 1 (01) :137-147
[4]   ECOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE USE OF ALUMINUM IN CARS, WITH PARTICULAR REGARD TO RECYCLING TECHNIQUES [J].
BUXMANN, K .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 1994, 10 (1-2) :17-23
[5]   The suitability of aluminium as an alternative material for car bodies [J].
Carle, D ;
Blount, G .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 1999, 20 (05) :267-272
[6]  
CARPENTER JA, 2006, 63 ANN WORLD MAGN C, P100
[7]   Lifecycle assessment and economic evaluation of recycling: A case study [J].
Craighill, AL ;
Powell, JC .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 1996, 17 (02) :75-96
[8]  
DAS SK, 2006, LIGHT MET AGE CHICAG, V0064, P00026
[9]   Materials selection for an automotive structure by integrating structural optimization with environmental impact assessment [J].
Ermolaeva, NS ;
Castro, MBG ;
Kandachar, PV .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2004, 25 (08) :689-698
[10]  
FANTETTI N, 2006, 63 ANN WORLD MAGN C, P19