The welfare costs of urban outdoor water restrictions

被引:60
作者
Brennan, Donna [1 ]
Tapsuwan, Sorada [1 ]
Ingram, Gordon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Agr & Resource Econ, Crawley, WA, Australia
关键词
household model; urban water demand; urban water restrictions;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8489.2007.00395.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Outdoor water restrictions are usually implemented as bans on a particular type of watering technology (sprinklers), which allow households to substitute for labour-intensive (hand-held) watering. This paper presents a household production model approach to analysing the impact of sprinkler restrictions on consumer welfare and their efficacy as a demand management tool. Central to our empirical analysis is an experimentally derived production function which describes the relationship between irrigation and lawn quality. We demonstrate that for a typical consumer complete sprinkler bans may be little more effective than milder restrictions policies, but are substantially more costly to the household.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 261
页数:19
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
*ACTEW CORP, 2004, ASS NEED INCR ACT WA
[2]   Estimating intrahousehold allocation in a collective model with household production [J].
Aronsson, T ;
Daunfeldt, SO ;
Wikström, M .
JOURNAL OF POPULATION ECONOMICS, 2001, 14 (04) :569-584
[3]  
*AUSTR BUR STAT, 2005, HOUS EXP SURV 200314
[4]  
*AUSTR RES CTR WAT, 2002, PERTH DOM WAT US STU
[5]   VALUE OF TIME IN RECREATION BENEFIT STUDIES [J].
CESARIO, FJ .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1976, 52 (01) :32-41
[6]  
COLMER TD, 2001, REDUCING WATER USE T
[7]  
Connellan G., 2002, EFFICIENT IRRIGATION
[8]  
De Janvry A, 2001, WORLD DEV, V29, P467, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00113-3
[9]  
*EC REG AUTH, 2005, FIN REP INQU URB WAT
[10]  
Garcia-Valinas M, 2006, APPL ECON, V38, P955, DOI DOI 10.1080/00036840600638925