Novel statistical tools for monitoring the safety of marketed drugs

被引:198
作者
Almenoff, J. S. [1 ]
Pattishall, E. N.
Gibbs, T. G.
DuMouchel, W.
Evans, S. J. W.
Yuen, N.
机构
[1] GlaxoSmithKline, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth Safety Evaluat & Ri, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[2] GlaxoSmithKline, Global Clin Safety & Pharmacovigilance, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth Safety Evaluat & Ri, Greenford, Middx, England
[3] Lincoln Technol, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Waltham, MA USA
[4] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, London WC1, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1038/sj.clpt.6100258
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Robust tools for monitoring the safety of marketed therapeutic products are of paramount importance to public health. In recent years, innovative statistical approaches have been developed to screen large post- marketing safety databases for adverse events (AEs) that occur with disproportionate frequency. These methods, known variously as quantitative signal detection, disproportionality analysis, or safety data mining, facilitate the identification of new safety issues or possible harmful effects of a product. In this article, we describe the statistical concepts behind these methods, as well as their practical application to monitoring the safety of pharmaceutical products using spontaneous AE reports. We also provide examples of how these tools can be used to identify novel drug interactions and demographic risk factors for adverse drug reactions. Challenges, controversies, and frontiers for future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 166
页数:10
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Perspectives on the use of data mining in pharmacovigilance [J].
Almenoff, J ;
Tonning, JM ;
Gould, AL ;
Szarfman, A ;
Hauben, M ;
Ouellet-Hellstrom, R ;
Ball, R ;
Hornbuckle, K ;
Walsh, L ;
Yee, C ;
Sacks, ST ;
Yuen, N ;
Patadia, V ;
Blum, M ;
Johnston, M ;
Gerrits, C ;
Seifert, H ;
LaCroix, K .
DRUG SAFETY, 2005, 28 (11) :981-1007
[2]   Disproportionality analysis using empirical Bayes data mining: a tool for the evaluation of drug interactions in the post-marketing setting [J].
Almenoff, JS ;
DuMouchel, W ;
Kindman, LA ;
Yang, XH ;
Fram, D .
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2003, 12 (06) :517-521
[3]  
ALMENOFF JS, IN PRESS DRUG INFO J
[4]   Comparative performance of two quantitative safety signalling methods - Implications for use in a pharmacovigilance department [J].
Almenoff, June S. ;
LaCroix, Karol K. ;
Yuen, Nancy A. ;
Fram, David ;
DuMouchel, William .
DRUG SAFETY, 2006, 29 (10) :875-887
[5]  
Amery WK, 1999, PHARMACOEPIDEM DR S, V8, P61, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1557(199901/02)8:1<61::AID-PDS395>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-A
[7]  
[Anonymous], PHARMACOEPIDEM DR S
[8]   DOES PROOF OF CAUSALITY EVER EXIST IN PHARMACOVIGILANCE [J].
AURICHE, M ;
LOUPI, E .
DRUG SAFETY, 1993, 9 (03) :230-235
[9]   Data-mining analyses of pharmacovigilance signals in relation to relevant comparison drugs [J].
Bate, A ;
Lindquist, M ;
Orre, R ;
Edwards, IR ;
Meyboom, RHB .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 58 (07) :483-490
[10]   A Bayesian neural network method for adverse drug reaction signal generation [J].
Bate, A ;
Lindquist, M ;
Edwards, IR ;
Olsson, S ;
Orre, R ;
Lansner, A ;
De Freitas, RM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 54 (04) :315-321