The user action framework: a reliable foundation for usability engineering support tools

被引:55
作者
Andre, TS
Hartson, HR
Belz, SM
McCreary, FA
机构
[1] USAF, Res Lab, Mesa, AZ 85212 USA
[2] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[3] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
关键词
user action framework; usability evaluation; tool support; evaluation techniques;
D O I
10.1006/ijhc.2000.0441
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Although various methods exist for performing usability evaluation, they lack a systematic framework for guiding and structuring the assessment and reporting activities. Consequently, analysis and reporting of usability data are ad hoc and do not live up to their potential in cost effectiveness, and usability engineering support tools are not well integrated. We developed the User Action Framework, a structured knowledge base of usability concepts and issues, as a framework on which to build a broad suite of usability engineering support tools. The User Action Framework helps to guide the development of each tool and to integrate the set of tools in the practitioner's working environment. An important characteristic of the User Action Framework is its own reliability in term of consistent use by practitioners. Consistent understanding and reporting of the underlying causes of usability problems are requirements for cost-effective analysis and redesign. Thus, high reliability in terms of agreement by users on what the User Action Framework means and how it is used is essential for its role as a common foundation for the tools. Here we describe how we achieved high reliability in the User Action Framework, and we support the claim with strongly positive results of a summative reliability study conducted to measure agreement among 10 usability experts in classifying 15 different usability problems. Reliability data from the User Action Framework are also compared to data collected from nine of the same usability experts using a classic heuristic evaluation technique. (C) 2001 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 136
页数:30
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Bodker S., 2021, Through the Interface: A Human Activity Approach to User Interface Design, V1st ed., DOI [https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003063971, DOI 10.1201/9781003063971]
  • [2] BROOKS P, 1994, USABILITY INSPECTION, P255
  • [3] Carroll J.M., 1991, Designing interaction, P74
  • [4] Cockton G, 1999, HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION - INTERACT '99, P344
  • [5] A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES
    COHEN, J
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) : 37 - 46
  • [6] Cuomo D. L., 1994, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, V6, P275, DOI 10.1080/10447319409526096
  • [7] CUOMO DL, 1992, PROCEEDINGS OF THE HUMAN FACTORS SOCIETY, 36TH ANNUAL MEETING, VOLS 1 AND 2, P1254
  • [8] DESURVIRE HW, 1994, USABILITY INSPECTION, P173
  • [9] DOUBLEDAY A, 1997, DES INT SYST DIS 97, P101
  • [10] DUTT A, 1994, PEOPLE COMPUTERS, V9, P109