Questionnaire validation: A brief guide for readers of the research literature

被引:134
作者
Jensen, MP
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Rehabil Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Ctr Multidisciplinary Pain, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
pain assessment; reliability; validity; factor analysis;
D O I
10.1097/00002508-200311000-00002
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 [麻醉学];
摘要
Because of the importance of pain assessment to understanding the nature and scope of pain problems, and for testing the efficacy of pain treatments, new pain measures are frequently developed. Research that describes the development and evaluation of pain measures should include detailed information concerning the validity and reliability of the measures. However, for the findings from this research to be most useful, the consumers of this research (clinicians and researchers who use pain measures) should understand the concepts of validity and reliability, and the procedures used for evaluating these in pain assessment research. The purpose of this commentary is to provide a summary of these psychometric issues, using the study and findings of Krause and Backonja as an illustrative example of the concepts.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 352
页数:8
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]
American Educational Research Association. American Psychological Association & N. C. on M. in E., 1999, STAND ED PSYCH TEST
[2]
SCREE TEST FOR NUMBER OF FACTORS [J].
CATTELL, RB .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1966, 1 (02) :245-276
[3]
Cleeland C. S., 1994, Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, V23, P129
[4]
The use of multiple-item scales for pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients [J].
Jensen, MP ;
Turner, LR ;
Turner, JA ;
Romano, JM .
PAIN, 1996, 67 (01) :35-40
[5]
INDEX OF FACTORIAL SIMPLICITY [J].
KAISER, HF .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1974, 39 (01) :31-36
[6]
KRAUSE SJ, 1966, IN PRESS BEHAV RES, V1, P245
[7]
Nunnally J. C., 1978, Psychometric Theory, V2
[8]
Tabachnick B. G., 2007, USING MULTIVARIATE S, VVol. 5