Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy: A prospective study of 945 patients

被引:107
作者
Rentz, J
Bull, D
Harpole, D
Bailey, S
Neumayer, L
Pappas, T
Krasnicka, B
Henderson, W
Daley, J
Khuri, S
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Inst Hlth Policy, Partners Healthcare Syst, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Vet Affairs Med Ctr, W Roxbury, MA USA
[6] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Cooperat Studies Program Coordinating Ctr, Hines, IL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mtc.2003.315
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Debate continues as to whether transhiatal esophagectomy results in lower morbidity and mortality than transthoracic esophagectomy. Most data addressing this issue are derived from single-institution studies. To investigate this question from a nationwide multicenter perspective, we used the Veterans Administration National Surgical Quality Improvement Program to prospectively analyze risk factors for morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy or transhiatal esophagectomy from 1991 to 2000. Methods: Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on 945 patients (mean age, 63 +/- 10 years). There were 562 transthoracic esophagectomies and 383 transhiatal esophagectomies in 105 hospitals, with complete 30-day outcomes recorded. Results: There were no differences in recorded preoperative variables between the groups that might bias any comparisons. Overall mortality was 10.0% (56/562) for transthoracic esophagectomy and 9.9% (38/383) for transhiatal esophagectomy (P = .983). Morbidity occurred in 47% (266/562) of patients after transthoracic esophagectomy and in 49% (188/383) of patients after transhiatal esophagectomy (P = .596). Risk factors for mortality common to both groups included a serum albumin value of less than 3.5 g/dL, age greater than 65 years, and blood transfusion of greater than 4 units (P < .05). When comparing transthoracic esophagectomy with transhiatal esophagectomy, there was no difference in the incidence of respiratory failure, renal failure, bleeding, infection, sepsis, anastomotic complications, or mediastinitis. Wound dehiscence occurred in 5% (18/383) of patients undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy and only 2% (12/562) of patients undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy (P = .036). Conclusions: These data demonstrate no significant differences in preoperative variables and postoperative mortality or morbidity between transthoracic esophagectomy and transhiatal esophagectomy on the basis of a 10-year, prospective, multi-institutional, nationwide study.
引用
收藏
页码:1114 / 1120
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   TRANSHIATAL AND TRANSTHORACIC ESOPHAGECTOMY - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY [J].
BOLTON, JS ;
SARDI, A ;
BOWEN, JC ;
ELLIS, JK .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1992, 51 (04) :249-253
[2]   SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL CANCER - A DECADE OF CHANGE [J].
BOLTON, JS ;
OCHSNER, NL ;
ABDOH, AA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1994, 219 (05) :475-480
[3]   A prospective randomized comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for lower-third esophageal carcinoma [J].
Chu, KM ;
Law, SYK ;
Fok, M ;
Wong, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 174 (03) :320-324
[4]  
Daley J, 1997, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V185, P328, DOI 10.1016/S1072-7515(01)00939-5
[5]   ESOPHAGECTOMY BY A TRANSHIATAL APPROACH OR THORACOTOMY - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
GOLDMINC, M ;
MADDERN, G ;
LEPRISE, E ;
MEUNIER, B ;
CAMPION, JP ;
LAUNOIS, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 80 (03) :367-370
[6]   Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: A meta-analysis [J].
Hulscher, JBF ;
Tijssen, JGP ;
Obertop, H ;
van Lanschot, JJB .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 72 (01) :306-313
[7]   Factors affecting morbidity, mortality, and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy [J].
Karl, RC ;
Schreiber, R ;
Boulware, D ;
Baker, S ;
Coppola, D .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 231 (05) :635-641
[8]   The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP - The first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care [J].
Khuri, SF ;
Daley, J ;
Henderson, W ;
Hur, K ;
Demakis, J ;
Aust, JB ;
Chong, V ;
Fabri, PJ ;
Gibbs, JO ;
Grover, F ;
Hammermeister, K ;
Irvin, G ;
McDonald, G ;
Passaro, E ;
Phillips, L ;
Scamman, F ;
Spencer, J ;
Stemple, JF .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 228 (04) :491-504
[9]   Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: Results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study [J].
Khuri, SF ;
Daley, J ;
Henderson, W ;
Hur, K ;
Gibbs, JO ;
Barbour, G ;
Demakis, J ;
Irvin, G ;
Stremple, JF ;
Grover, F ;
McDonald, G ;
Passaro, E ;
Fabri, PJ ;
Spencer, J ;
Hammermeister, K ;
Aust, JB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1997, 185 (04) :315-327
[10]  
KHURI SF, 1995, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V180, P519