Current status of patient-reported outcomes in industry-sponsored oncology clinical trials and product labels

被引:31
作者
Gondek, Kathleen
Sagnier, Pierre-Philippe
Gilchrist, Kim
Woolley, J. Michael
机构
[1] Bayer Corp, West Haven, CT 06516 USA
[2] AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE USA
[3] Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
[4] Bayer Pharmaceut, Puteaux La Defense, France
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2007.11.3845
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Assessing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials is of interest to clinicians, patients, regulators, and industry. The use and impact of PROs is a growing area of methodologic research, particularly as they relate to tumor types, biomarkers, and various patient populations and cultures. Both the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products in recent guidance have acknowledged the need to account for treatment-related impact on patient symptoms and/or health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Clinical research likely reflects the informative value of PROs. A search of www.clinicaltrials.gov, the FDA Web site, and product package inserts was conducted to assess the inclusion of symptom assessment and HRQOL within industry-sponsored clinical trials in cancer and approved cancer therapies and their respective product labels. Overall, there were 2,704 industry-sponsored oncology trials, of which 322 (12%) included a PRO measure. Of the 70 FDA new or revised labels, only six package inserts include PRO data. Symptoms were assessed uniformly across the phases of clinical trials, whereas HRQOL assessment increased in the later phases of clinical trials. Collecting PRO data can enhance our understanding of cancer burden and the impact of interventions on patients' lives.
引用
收藏
页码:5087 / 5093
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
*AM CANC SOC, 2007, CANC PREV EARL DET F
[2]   Optimal timing for QOL assessments [J].
不详 .
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CANCER, 2005, 29 (06) :278-284
[3]  
[Anonymous], IS THIS CLIN TRIAL F
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Cancer Facts and Figures
[5]   Quality of life assessment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients undergoing an accelerated radiotherapy regimen: Report of ECOG study 4593 [J].
Auchter, RM ;
Scholtens, D ;
Adak, S ;
Wagner, H ;
Cella, DF ;
Mehta, MP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 50 (05) :1199-1206
[6]   Oncologists' use of quality of life information: Results of a survey of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group physicians [J].
Bezjak, A ;
Ng, P ;
Skeel, R ;
DePetrillo, AD ;
Comis, R ;
Taylor, KM .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (01) :1-13
[7]   Variation in the estimation of quality-adjusted life-years by different preference-based instruments [J].
Conner-Spady, B ;
Suarez-Almazor, ME .
MEDICAL CARE, 2003, 41 (07) :791-801
[8]  
COOMBS JH, 2002, QOL NEWSLETTER, V29, P1
[9]  
*EUR MED AG, REFL PAP PUBL WITHDR
[10]   End points and United States food and drug administration approval of oncology drugs [J].
Johnson, JR ;
Williams, G ;
Pazdur, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (07) :1404-1411