Is the Health Utilities Index responsive in total hip arthroplasty patients?

被引:30
作者
Blanchard, C
Feeny, D
Mahon, JL
Bourne, R
Rorabeck, C
Stitt, L
Webster-Bogaert, S
机构
[1] Inst Hlth Econ, Edmonton, AB T5J 3N4, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Sch Human Kinet, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, LHSC UC, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada
[4] London Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Surg, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada
关键词
HUI; responsiveness; total hip arthroplasty patients; WOMAC; MACTAR; SF-36;
D O I
10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00203-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The purpose is to examine the responsiveness of the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 (HUI2), Mark 3 (HUI3), and other generic and disease-specific measures in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: Ninety patients (mean age = 68.13; SD = 8.15) on a waiting list for THA completed measures that included the standard gamble, HUI2, HUI3, SF-36, Harris Hip Scale, WOMAC, and MACTAR. before and after THA. Responsiveness statistics (effect size, standardized response mean, Guyatt's responsiveness statistic, paired-sample t-tests, and relative efficiency statistic) were calculated. Results: The disease-specific measures were more responsive than the generic measures. Rankings of the degree of responsiveness varied depending on the responsiveness statistic used. Conclusions: Disease-specific measures are the most responsive in THA patients. However, the SF-36, HUI2, and HUI3 had summary scores and domain/attributes scores that were also responsive and provided additional information. Among the generic measures, HUI3 was the most responsive. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1046 / 1054
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   PAIN ASSESSMENT IN OSTEO-ARTHRITIS - EXPERIENCE WITH THE WOMAC OSTEO-ARTHRITIS INDEX [J].
BELLAMY, N .
SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1989, 18 (04) :14-17
[2]   Generic and condition-specific outcome measures for people with osteoarthritis of the knee [J].
Brazier, JE ;
Harper, R ;
Munro, J ;
Walters, SJ ;
Snaith, ML .
RHEUMATOLOGY, 1999, 38 (09) :870-877
[3]   A COMPARISON OF EVALUATIVE INDEXES OF QUALITY-OF-LIFE AND COGNITIVE FUNCTION IN HEMODIALYSIS-PATIENTS [J].
CHURCHILL, DN ;
WALLACE, JE ;
LUDWIN, D ;
BEECROFT, ML ;
TAYLOR, DW .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1991, 12 (04) :S159-S167
[4]  
Cohen J., 1998, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, V2nd
[5]  
Curran D, 1998, OX MED PUBL, P249
[6]   REPRODUCIBILITY AND RESPONSIVENESS OF HEALTH-STATUS MEASURES - STATISTICS AND STRATEGIES FOR EVALUATION [J].
DEYO, RA ;
DIEHR, P ;
PATRICK, DL .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1991, 12 (04) :S142-S158
[7]   Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system [J].
Feeny, D ;
Furlong, W ;
Torrance, GW ;
Goldsmith, CH ;
Zhu, ZL ;
DePauw, S ;
Denton, M ;
Boyle, M .
MEDICAL CARE, 2002, 40 (02) :113-128
[8]  
Feeny D., 1996, QUALITY LIFE PHARMAC, P239
[9]  
FURLONG W, 1990, 909 MCM U CTR HLTH E
[10]  
FURLONG W, 1998, 9811 UMCM U CTR HLTH