Intravenous immunoglobulin and Thymoglobulin facilitate kidney transplantation in complement-dependent cytotoxicity B-cell and flow cytometry T- or B-cell crossmatch-positive patients

被引:60
作者
Akalin, E
Ames, S
Sehgal, V
Fotino, M
Daly, L
Murphy, B
Bromberg, JS
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Nephrol, New York, NY USA
[3] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Recantati Miller Transplant Inst, New York, NY USA
[4] Rogosin Inst, Immunogenet & Transplant Ctr, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.TP.0000084200.40159.EC
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Thymoglobulin and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy on the clinical outcome of a putatively high-risk group of kidney transplant recipients who have positive B-cell complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) along with positive T- or B-cell flow cytometry (FC) crossmatch results. Methods. We prospectively studied the effects of IVIG and Thymoglobulin induction treatment in B-cell CDC, and T- or B-cell FC crossmatch-positive kidney transplant recipients (seven women and one man; mean age, 43+/-12 years). Results. Mean peak panel-reactive antibody (PRA) was 47+/-32. Three patients had donor-specific antibody by flow PRA (two anti-DR4 and one anti-A2). Each recipient received induction treatment with IVIG 100 mg/kg for 3 days and Thymoglobulin 1.5 mg/kg for 5 days after transplantation. No acute cellular rejections occurred during a median follow-up of 15 months (range, 12-17 months). Only one acute humoral rejection occurred 8 days after transplantation, which responded to plasmapheresis, IVIG, and rituximab. One allograft was lost because of polyoma nephritis. Patient survival was 100% and allograft survival was 88%. Conclusion: Our results indicate that IVIG and Thymoglobulin induction treatment may facilitate kidney transplantation in B-cell CDC and T- or B-cell FC crossmatch-positive patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1444 / 1447
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Association between a positive flow cytometry crossmatch and the development of chronic rejection in primary renal transplantation [J].
Abou el Fettouh, H ;
Cook, DJ ;
Bishay, E ;
Flechner, S ;
Goldfarb, D ;
Modlin, C ;
Dennis, V ;
Novick, AC .
UROLOGY, 2000, 56 (03) :369-372
[2]   Impaired renal graft survival after a positive B-cell flow-cytometry crossmatch [J].
Bittencourt, MC ;
Rebibou, JM ;
Saint-Hillier, Y ;
Chabod, J ;
Dupont, I ;
Chalopin, JM ;
Herve, P ;
Tiberghien, P .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 13 (08) :2059-2064
[3]  
Cho Y W, 2001, Clin Transpl, P237
[4]  
Cook D J, 1998, Clin Transpl, P413
[5]   Desensitization and subsequent transplantation kidney transplantation of patient using intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) [J].
Glotz, D ;
Antoine, C ;
Julia, P ;
Suberbielle-Boissel, C ;
Boudjeltia, S ;
Fraoui, R ;
Hacen, C ;
Duboust, A ;
Bariety, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 2 (08) :758-760
[6]  
Karpinski M, 2001, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V12, P2807, DOI 10.1681/ASN.V12122807
[7]   Flow cytometry-detected IgG is not a contraindication to renal transplantation - IgM may be beneficial to outcome [J].
Kerman, RH ;
Susskind, B ;
Buyse, I ;
Pryzbylowski, P ;
Ruth, J ;
Warnell, S ;
Gruber, SA ;
Katz, S ;
Van Buren, CT ;
Kahan, BD .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 68 (12) :1855-1858
[8]   Identification of the antibodies involved in B-cell crossmatch positivity in renal transplantation [J].
Le Bas-Bernardet, S ;
Hourmant, M ;
Valentin, N ;
Paitier, C ;
Giral-Classe, M ;
Curry, S ;
Follea, G ;
Soulillou, JP ;
Bignon, JD .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (04) :477-482
[9]   Specificity of preformed alloantibodies causing B cell positive flow crossmatch in renal transplantation [J].
Lobashevsky, AL ;
Senkbeil, RW ;
Shoaf, J ;
Mink, C ;
Rowe, C ;
Lobashevsky, ES ;
Burke, R ;
Hudson, S ;
Deierhoi, MH ;
Thomas, JM .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 14 (06) :533-542
[10]   B-cell crossmatching and kidney allograft outcome in 9031 United States transplant recipients [J].
Mahoney, RJ ;
Taranto, S ;
Edwards, E .
HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY, 2002, 63 (04) :324-335