Why Risk Analysis is Difficult, and Some Thoughts on How to Proceed

被引:19
作者
Ben-Haim, Yakov [1 ]
机构
[1] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Mech Engn, Yitzhak Modai Chair Technol & Econ, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
关键词
Info-gap theory; optimizing; robustness; satisficing; uncertainty;
D O I
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01859.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Risk analysis is challenged in three ways by uncertainty. Our understanding of the world and its uncertainties is evolving; indeterminism is an inherent part of the open universe in which we live; and learning from experience involves untestable assumptions. We discuss several concepts of robustness as tools for responding to these epistemological challenges. The use of models is justified, even though they are known to err. A concept of robustness is illustrated in choosing between a conventional technology and an innovative, promising, but more uncertain technology. We explain that nonprobabilistic robust decisions are sometimes good probabilistic bets. Info-gap and worst-case concepts of robustness are compared. Finally, we examine the exploitation of favorable but uncertain opportunities and its relation to robust decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:1638 / 1646
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Adams Henry., 1918, ED H ADAMS
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1997, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding
  • [3] [Anonymous], ENCY PHILOS
  • [4] [Anonymous], WERE JUST GETTING ST
  • [5] [Anonymous], ALGEBRA
  • [6] [Anonymous], HISTORY
  • [7] [Anonymous], POLICY ANALYSIS
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1986, The history of statistics: The measurement of uncertainty before 1900
  • [9] [Anonymous], IS NONPROBABILISTIC
  • [10] [Anonymous], INQUIRY