Compliance with patient-reported outcomes in multicenter clinical trials: Methodologic and practical approaches

被引:23
作者
Land, Stephanie R.
Ritter, Marcie W.
Costantino, Joseph P.
Julian, Thomas B.
Cronin, Walter M.
Haile, Sarah R.
Wolmark, Norman
Ganz, Patricia A.
机构
[1] Operat & Biostat Ctr, Natl Surg Adjuvant Breast & Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[3] Allegheny Gen Hosp, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehens Canc Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth & Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2007.12.1749
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose This report describes interventions undertaken by the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) to improve compliance with patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessments in the setting of multicenter cancer clinical trials. We describe the effectiveness of several interventions and of observational factors. Methods PRO submission rates were analyzed for the following three NSABP protocols: the Study of Raloxifene and Tamoxifen (STAR), B-32, and B-35. Institutions participating in protocol B-35 were randomly assigned to receive automated reminders of upcoming assessments or not. Compliance was analyzed with a logistic repeated measures mixed modeling. Results Compliance was high in the three protocols, with rates greater than 80% for nearly all time points. Institutions were a significant source of variability (P <.01). The largest institutions had the highest compliance in STAR (odds ratio [ OR] = 0.68 for < 50 participants enrolled and OR = 0.82 for 50 to 99 participants enrolled v larger institutions; P <.001). Midsized institutions had highest compliance in B-32 (OR = 4.63 for 31 to 50 patients enrolled and OR = 3.12 for > 50 patients enrolled v small institutions; P =.007). Compliance increased with participant age in STAR (OR = 0.57, 0.89, and 1.01 for ages < 50, 50 to 60, and 60 to 70 years, respectively, v > 70 years; P <.001). Race was significant in B-32 (OR = 2.63 for white v nonwhite; P <.001) and in STAR (OR = 1.41 for white v nonwhite; P <.001). Treatment group was significant in B-32 (OR = 0.74; P =.006). The B-35 prospective reminder did not improve compliance significantly (P =.30), but in B-32, delinquency sanctions were significant (OR = 1.56; P =.007). Conclusion Compliance in NSABP PRO studies is higher now than a decade ago. Results for compliance initiatives were mixed. Age and race are important factors, but institutional variation remains significant and largely unexplained.
引用
收藏
页码:5113 / 5120
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Do oncologists have an increasing interest in the Quality of Life of their patients? A literture review of the last 15 years [J].
BatelCopel, LM ;
Kornblith, AB ;
Batel, PC ;
Holland, JC .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 33 (01) :29-32
[2]  
Bernhard J, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P517, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980315/15)17:5/7<517::AID-SIM799>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-S
[4]   QUALITY-OF-LIFE ASSESSMENT IN CANCER CLINICAL-TRIALS - AN INTERVENTION BY ITSELF [J].
BERNHARD, J ;
GUSSET, H ;
HURNY, C .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 1995, 3 (01) :66-71
[5]  
Bernhard J, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P633, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980315/15)17:5/7<633::AID-SIM810>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-U
[7]  
Coates A, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P533
[8]  
Fallowfield L, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P541
[9]  
FARICLOUGH DL, 2002, STAT DESIGN MEASUREM, P32
[10]  
Ganz PA, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P613, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980315/15)17:5/7<613::AID-SIM808>3.0.CO