Leading and Learning through Dynamic Performance Management in Government

被引:16
作者
Munteanu, Ioana [1 ]
Newcomer, Kathryn [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Smithsonian Inst, Washington, DC 20560 USA
[2] George Washington Univ, Trachtenberg Sch Publ Policy & Publ Adm, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[3] Natl Acad Publ Adm, Washington, DC USA
[4] Amer Evaluat Assoc, Washington, DC USA
关键词
ORGANIZATIONS; FRAMEWORK; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1111/puar.13126
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Performance management in government is at a crossroads. The advent of big data and advances in technological and analytical tools have provided opportunities to measure and track a wider variety of internal and external indicators on a more timely basis. Public leaders require new vision and capacity to design and manage knowledge-building systems. This article provides two tools: (1) a more comprehensive open systems performance management framework and (2) a model of leadership needed to orchestrate such systems-knowledge brokers who orchestrate the demand for and supply of evidence. This article recommends that public agencies strategically build evidence to better track measures of the effects of governmental actions on public value and their intended and unintended consequences on the ecosystem; articulate, measure, and test the assumptions built into their operating models; and learn from routine monitoring of the dynamic environment in which their organizations strive to achieve their missions.
引用
收藏
页码:316 / 325
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Why so many "rigorous" evaluations fail to identify unintended consequences of development programs: How mixed methods can contribute
    Bamberger, Michael
    Tarsilla, Michele
    Hesse-Biber, Sharlene
    [J]. EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2016, 55 : 155 - 162
  • [2] Blum M.L., 1968, Industrial Psychology: Its Theoretical and Social Foundations, V3rd
  • [3] Callahan K., 2009, Moving towards outcome-oriented performance measurement systems
  • [4] Callahan Kate, 2001, 62 ANN C AM SOC PUBL
  • [5] Carande Carl, 2017, HARVARD BUSINESS REV
  • [6] Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking (CEP), 2017, CEP FIN REP PROM EV
  • [7] DalleMule Leandro, 2017, HARVARD BUSINESS REV
  • [8] Considering Unintended Consequences: Evidence From Recent Evaluations of US Foreign Assistance Programs
    de Alteriis, Martin
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2020, 41 (01) : 54 - 70
  • [9] Drucker P. F., 1954, PRACTICE MANAGEMENT, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780080942360
  • [10] Eoyang G., 1998, Evaluation in a complex adaptive system. Managing Complexity in Organizations