A developmental gradient in the mechanism of K+ uptake during light-stimulated leaf growth in Nicotiana tabacum L.

被引:10
作者
Stiles, KA [1 ]
McClintick, A [1 ]
Van Volkenburgh, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Bot, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
cell expansion; light-stimulated leaf growth; Nicotiana; potassium uptake; proton efflux; tetraethylammonium (effect on K+ uptake);
D O I
10.1007/s00425-003-1023-6
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Light causes growth of dicotyledonous leaves by stimulating proton efflux, cell wall acidification and loosening, and solute accumulation for turgor maintenance. For cells still undergoing cell division at the base of expanding tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Xanthi) leaves, light-stimulated growth depends on K+ uptake, and is inhibited by the potassium channel blocker tetraethylammonium (TEA). The generality of this mechanism has been tested by comparing the effect of light on the growth-associated physiology of dividing and expanding cells in the base with cells at the tip growing by cell expansion only. The magnitude of the light-induced growth response of excised leaf discs is greatest at the leaf base and declines as cells mature. Basal tissue is more sensitive to exogenous potassium, which enhances light-stimulated growth at < 1 mM, whereas tip tissue requires higher levels (> 10 in M). Growth is inhibited by TEA similarly in tip and base. However, light-stimulated K+ uptake and proton efflux respond differently to TEA in tip and basal tissue. In basal tissue, TEA reduces light-stimulated K+ uptake by 60% and inhibits light-stimulated proton efflux. These results agree with those presented by M. Claussen et al. (1997, Planta 201:227-234) showing that auxin-stimulated H+ pump activity and growth in coleoptiles require K+ uptake as an electrical counterbalance to H+ efflux. In contrast, in tip tissue, TEA inhibits light-stimulated K+ uptake by only 17% and does not inhibit proton efflux. Our results suggest that the basipetal gradient in the effect of TEA on light-regulated growth physiology can be explained by TEA effects on K+ uptake: TEA inhibits light-stimulated H+ pump activity, wall acidification and membrane hyperpolarization only in cells dependent on TEA-sensitive channels for light-stimulated K+ uptake. Further, our data suggest that younger, basal tissue is dependent on TEA-sensitive, sucrose-stimulatable channels for light-stimulated K+ uptake whereas older, tip tissue is able to use an additional, TEA-insensitive K+ transporter to mediate light-stimulated K+ uptake.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 596
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Elementary auxin response chains at the plasma membrane involve external abp1 and multiple electrogenic ion transport proteins [J].
BarbierBrygoo, H ;
Zimmermann, S ;
Thomine, S ;
White, IR ;
Millner, P ;
Guern, J .
PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 1996, 18 (1-2) :23-28
[2]   STIMULATION OF GROWTH AND ION UPTAKE IN BEAN-LEAVES BY RED AND BLUE-LIGHT [J].
BLUM, DE ;
ELZENGA, JTM ;
LINNEMEYER, PA ;
VANVOLKENBURGH, E .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 100 (04) :1968-1975
[3]   The role of auxin-binding protein 1 in the expansion of tobacco leaf cells [J].
Chen, JG ;
Shimomura, S ;
Sitbon, F ;
Sandberg, G ;
Jones, AM .
PLANT JOURNAL, 2001, 28 (06) :607-617
[4]   Dual auxin signaling pathways control cell elongation and division [J].
Chen, JG .
JOURNAL OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 2001, 20 (03) :255-264
[5]   Enzymes for lipolysis and fatty acid metabolism in different organelle fractions from rape seed cotyledons [J].
Hoppe, A ;
Theimer, RR .
PLANTA, 1997, 202 (02) :227-234
[6]  
DALE JE, 1988, ANNU REV PLANT PHYS, V39, P267, DOI 10.1146/annurev.pp.39.060188.001411
[7]  
Dale JE., 1983, GROWTH FUNCTIONING L
[8]  
Dennison KL, 2001, PLANT PHYSIOL, V127, P1012, DOI 10.1104/pp.010193
[9]   Intercellular protein trafficking through plasmodesmata [J].
Ding, B .
PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1998, 38 (1-2) :279-310
[10]   A MICROSCALE TECHNIQUE FOR GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY MASS-SPECTROMETRY MEASUREMENTS OF PICOGRAM AMOUNTS OF INDOLE-3-ACETIC-ACID IN PLANT-TISSUES [J].
EDLUND, A ;
EKLOF, S ;
SUNDBERG, B ;
MORITZ, T ;
SANDBERG, G .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 108 (03) :1043-1047